BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Better to train guard or bigs?

Better to train guard or bigs?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: E.B.W.

This Post:
00
234720.12 in reply to 234720.11
Date: 1/16/2013 12:35:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
I agree but unfortunately when you look at U21 big men and young centers, generally no other skills besides inside shot, rebounding, inside D, and shot-blocking are above mediocre-average, unless they were drafted with skills like that.

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
From: malice

This Post:
00
234720.14 in reply to 234720.12
Date: 1/16/2013 1:22:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Smart nations... not so much.
Two of my trainees are bigs, both have reasonable/good secondaries - and both were in their U21 NTs (Japan & HK). The Japanese player left the U21 program, and immediately went to the NT.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
From: FenXas

This Post:
22
234720.15 in reply to 234720.14
Date: 1/16/2013 4:07:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
269269
Its because of "big number" of active teams in Nippon ;)

From: Ulkar

This Post:
00
234720.16 in reply to 234720.7
Date: 1/16/2013 4:28:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
235235
I agree with all what you saif except that SF is maybe the position for which potential is the least important, look at all the NTs, that's maybe the only position where you'll see superstar potentiol players. For others high MVPs will already fall too short for most NTs

From: malice

This Post:
00
234720.17 in reply to 234720.15
Date: 1/16/2013 5:35:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
Ranked #38. You can check it out for me if you like, but that might be pretty good for a nation of under 30 users. Not quite as good as Lithuania, granted.
Whilst at it, you might want to check HK. I believe that they have a pretty good U21 program (where my *other* trainee saw good minutes as a 21yo).
My point is, Mr Glass is largely incorrect when he states that most PFC trainers are only focusing on primaries - even those with NT players.

I think the term I'm looking for would be "nyah-nyah"?

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
From: FenXas

This Post:
00
234720.19 in reply to 234720.17
Date: 1/16/2013 9:01:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
269269
Agree ;)

From: GM-hrudey

This Post:
00
234720.20 in reply to 234720.7
Date: 1/16/2013 11:34:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
I personally like training a SF (even though I train Big Men), and think training a SF is the best way to go. There's just a few things you gotta follow....

potential: for a SF you need very high potential to get a SF to where you need/want him to be. I like PAS (perrenial allstar) potential but more then likely you'd want a Superstar guy in it.

skills: can't have one jacked up skill at all, and if a skill is jacked up, it probably has to be one of the skills easier to train. for me, a hole in RB, JS or DR/HA is easy to fix. but skills like OD and ID are very hard to fix sometimes to where they can be efficient in that level. I usually go for a 5/5 guy to begin with at SF, not too low though.

time: you'd need to have a lot of patience training a 6'5'' to 6'6'' SF. It takes sometimes longer then others to train the players.


hope this helps


btw if anybody wants to train a big man, a Big Man with good secondaries are juicy on the TL and can give you a lot of dough.




A SF actually generally will consume less potential than a traditionally-trained big or guard because instead of having a few super high skills, there will be a much wider base of good but not cap-killing skills.

But not only are bigs with good secondaries quite nice on the TL, they can also be very effective players. My fourth-leading scorer right now is a 6'10 21-year old trainee who is technically a 9k point guard right now but is playing mostly PF.

This Post:
00
234720.21 in reply to 234720.1
Date: 1/16/2013 11:47:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
126126
I've read that it is cheaper to get good bigs on the TL than it is to get good guards. Does that mean that it is better to train guards vs bigs if you had the choice? Obviously I would train a HOF big over a benchwarmer guard. But assuming these things were the same, what would you choose to train? And why is it people say good guards are worth more on the TL while bigs are a dime a dozen?

Thanks!

Better to train guards. Bigs you can always buy left and right. But it's rare, and expensive, to buy guArds you like. Also, in training guards you can sell away 1-2 of the 3 you trAin each time and make nasty profits. I bought pas guards that had some ugly skills for 1k trained them up and sold for over 100k. The one I still have could easily go for around 300k. Training guards just takes more effort on your part as higher division you are... The less you can afford sometimes a trainees defense and stay competitve

This Post:
11
234720.22 in reply to 234720.21
Date: 1/16/2013 4:28:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532

Better to train Bigs. Guards you can always buy left and right. But it's rare, and expensive, to buy Bigs you like. Also, in training Bigs you can sell away 1-2 of the 3 you trAin each time and make nasty profits.

This, is also true - if you train bigs well.
I sold my last two trainees for...
(22851352) - 1.2 million at age 20.
(21452760) - 1.8 million at age 21.
I would never sell my oldest trainee (21305788), he's simply too valuable to me (both sentimentally and actually), and I can't imagine selling my #2: (23706795)... but if I did, they'd possibly go for north of 3 million. Maybe.

There's no such thing as a *right* way. There's no such thing as the best position to train. You train 'em well, you'll see profits.
One thing I'll say about SFs, whilst it's nice to have a guy who's easy to train, and will see big profits if they're nice... invariably they will always play out of position whilst you're training them.

Last edited by malice at 1/16/2013 4:30:38 PM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
Advertisement