BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > The "Got a Question" Thread

The "Got a Question" Thread

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
237850.2 in reply to 237850.1
Date: 03/05/2013 21:10:50
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
What position would you play this guy in, SF, SG or PG?

Jump Shot: wondrous Jump Range: prolific
Outside Def.: prodigious Handling: tremendous
Driving: wondrous Passing: sensational
Inside Shot: proficient Inside Def.: sensational
Rebounding: proficient Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: average Free Throw: average

This Post:
00
237850.3 in reply to 237850.2
Date: 03/05/2013 21:36:43
Overall Posts Rated:
329329
My two top players are my SF and SG and I lack a good PG, so I'd play him at PG. Otherwise, I'd play him at SG.

This Post:
00
237850.4 in reply to 237850.2
Date: 03/05/2013 21:38:25
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
SG (passing almost high enough for PG, IS too low for SF)

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
237850.5 in reply to 237850.2
Date: 03/05/2013 21:43:37
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
With his inside skills I'd definitely say SF. His passing is too low to run an offense effectively especially in Naismith and his perimeter shooting is also kind of low.

This Post:
00
237850.6 in reply to 237850.5
Date: 03/05/2013 21:50:30
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
Thanks folks, now I just wish I had that player so I would be forced to decide :)

WHo has the next question?

This Post:
11
237850.7 in reply to 237850.6
Date: 03/05/2013 21:59:40
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Who wants to buy my players?

Serious question, I'm looking to experiment. Anybody have suggestion on particular team builds? I'm thinking of going more perimeter offense with two bigs with high blocking in a zone defense.

This Post:
00
237850.8 in reply to 237850.7
Date: 03/05/2013 22:34:07
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
I gave you a +1, you were long overdue...

I'd like to see the changes first before I make any suggestions but just for kicks awhile back I went looking for $75000+ bigs on the market with high SB and there basically weren't any. SB is almost always the lowest skill of the 4 'big man' skills. Depending on the changes, players with high SB might suddenly get expensive.

This Post:
00
237850.9 in reply to 237850.8
Date: 03/05/2013 22:38:55
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Could you take back that +1...

Anywho, I'm going to try and sacrifice IS, but yes there aren't many with high block especially ones with good passing. I really need to try something new, its getting kinda monotonous with Look inside and man2man all the time.

This Post:
00
237850.10 in reply to 237850.9
Date: 03/05/2013 22:44:27
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
I agree completely! Unfortunately I have built my entire team around playing look inside. I too have considered changing and when I do it will be to a princeton offence...

This Post:
00
237850.11 in reply to 237850.10
Date: 03/05/2013 23:09:43
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
I think the expected changes are long overdue. When you have every top team in B3 playing LI/M2M game after game then it's time to do something to alter that. I'm sure much of the problem is that everyone has built players to fit those tactics but I'd love to see a game where all the top teams are playing a variety of tactics. I"m pretty sure that's the way the game was intended to be played from the beginning.

This Post:
00
237850.12 in reply to 237850.11
Date: 03/06/2013 10:20:24
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
Look in side is dominant and that is the reason it is so over used. The argument has ben going on for many seasons that teams are not built for other offences so they do not succeed. Part of me agrees that that is a fair assesment however it is almost impossible to find players to fit these other tactics without them having major holes.

If enough users change there training plan it will surely help.

Advertisement