BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Princeton offense, a joke?

Princeton offense, a joke?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
133577.5 in reply to 133577.4
Date: 03/07/2010 17:04:48
1986 Celtics
IV.10
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I'm not going to get into the underlying dynamics of how we simulate the offense... but yes, Princeton offense is generally slow paced and results in generally more 3 pointers and layups

From: Plotts
This Post:
00
133577.6 in reply to 133577.5
Date: 03/07/2010 18:13:21
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
That's very Cheney like response. We all know that it is generally more slow paced and generally more 3's and layups are attempted. You can't comment either way on if what I described is a possible outcome though?

If Princeton relies on players passing more and ball movement, would it be fair to assume a team of players who have solid, passing, driving, and outside/inside shooting skills is what one would need to run BB Princeton effectively?

From: yodabig
This Post:
00
133577.7 in reply to 133577.3
Date: 03/07/2010 19:29:56
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Wow quite an impressive answer. Really hard to argue with that even though some people will try.

I have run almost every offence except this one. There is no point in people saying you need good passing, driving, handling, jump shot and jump range in all your players to run this. If you had that you could run anything so what would be the advantage of Princeton? Can someone be a little more specific? What do you really need? My understanding is the most important things are:

PF- Passing
Guards/SF - JR and DR

Is that close?

From: Plotts

This Post:
00
133577.8 in reply to 133577.7
Date: 03/07/2010 21:18:46
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Not really. They said BB Princeton is not exactly like real Princeton, but it is most similar to that system considering what the other systems do.

If I had the money, this is what I'd do. Assuming your team is decent...

PG-

JS: 6-8 JR: 10-13
OD 11-13 H: 9-13
DR: 11-14 P: 12-14
IS: 4-7 ID: 3-5
RB: 3-5 SB: 3-5

SG-

JS: 8-10 JR: 12-14
OD: 11-13 H: 8-12
DR: 10-13 P: 8-11
IS: 5-8 ID: 4-6
RB: 4-7 SB: 4-6

SF -

JS: 7-10 JR: 10-12
OD: 9-11 H: 7-9
DR: 10-13 P: 7-10
IS: 8-12 ID: 7-10
RB: 7-10 SB: 7-10

PF -

JS: 6-9 JR: 7-10
OD: 5-9 H: 5-8
DR: 8-11 P: 5-8
IS: 11-15 ID: 11-15
RB: 9-13 SB: 7-10

C-

JS: 2-4 JR: 4-7
OD: 3-6 H: 6-10
DR: 8-11 P: 8-11
IS: 12-16 ID: 12-16
RB: 13-17 SB: 9-11

From: Marx_T

This Post:
00
133577.9 in reply to 133577.8
Date: 03/08/2010 03:42:07
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
you can play whatever roster you have. if you have outside minded offense and going to lose strongly in rebounding or have a big difference in enthusiasm - use princeton, thats all.

From: brian

This Post:
00
133577.10 in reply to 133577.9
Date: 03/08/2010 11:28:12
Overall Posts Rated:
575575
Not really as that's leaving out the importance of secondary skills in particular offenses.

The GE and training systems are complex enough that I don't think anyone will be cracking these details AND making them public. Some of these basics (ie: "Princeton results in more 3's and layups and requires players to have lots of passing", etc) would be useful in the game manual. This would give teams something concrete to build a team and training system around. Maybe this would help support the need for having multi-skilled players and make them more valuable.

In real life you can actually see players on the court, how offenses and defenses move, there's nothing secret about the game that can't be scouted. Here we have players with hidden skills and some abstract box scores. It's a pretty confusing game for even the most experienced managers. Sometimes it seems we're just throwing darts at a board blindfolded.

Much of the useful information may come from BB comments randomly around the forums. If I want to know why my 10 JS center can't hit a jumper on an atrocious outside defender, where do i start? Did he just miss a shot he should have made, was he picked up by another player, etc. I'll never know.

Last edited by brian at 03/08/2010 11:31:36

"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
From: Plotts

This Post:
00
133577.11 in reply to 133577.10
Date: 03/08/2010 11:50:48
Overall Posts Rated:
1111
Well put Brain, hey whose leg do I have to hump to get a dry martini around here?

I'm in the process of compiling some comments I think should go in the GE. The commentary is sub par compared to the rest of the game.


From: Marx_T

This Post:
00
133577.12 in reply to 133577.10
Date: 03/08/2010 12:34:41
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
leaving out the importance of secondary skills in particular offenses.
there is basketball ABC for that, too much (thinking) is allways bad. just my opinion.

From: Marot

This Post:
00
133577.13 in reply to 133577.12
Date: 03/08/2010 15:21:55
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
If you dont have secundary skills on your outside players(PG-SG-SF) i dont know how you want to play princeton right. You really need lot of passing in the 3 outside man's and another skills like driving and IS also helps a lot. So you forgot the D ;)

From: Marx_T

This Post:
00
133577.14 in reply to 133577.13
Date: 03/08/2010 15:54:43
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
if it was to me, then... fast attack needs good offence, rebounding. off course with ball handling passing etc. defence is´t so important because of high speed. slow attack high defense, probably are then lower skilled players (offence, reb) <- higher experience helps out. no more words from me :D

Last edited by Marx_T at 03/08/2010 15:55:55

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
133577.15 in reply to 133577.8
Date: 03/09/2010 05:59:08
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i would switch JR and JS in your proposal.

Advertisement