BuzzerBeater Forums

BB USA > NT official thread

NT official thread

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
292200.10 in reply to 292200.9
Date: 05/29/2018 13:56:45
Greensboro Generals
IV.2
Overall Posts Rated:
746746
Yes, and no. First off if you got your GS at strong in my book you've done your job. Proficient is unpredictable, so I don't think we can lay one iota on the rank and file who has gone to the time, trouble and expense to build their beast. And I think that most of them are taking NT needs into consideration so again that is not where I see fault. Maybe it was just the way the contest played out but Poland had a much more balanced minute distribution. And I think at the end of the half, and end of the game that can seriously influence matters. And when did this get out of hand? The second period.

Also our decision to prep for inside and Poland going motion influenced matters greatly. I am of the school of if your gonna guess in a game where that guess better be right then you are better off not guessing at all. And when the guess is not just a shade wrong but full blown that gives the opponent such an advantage. GDP is in my book a tactic that is best used in situations where there might not be any other way to pull out the game, in spite of some slight built in advantages Poland had last night was not one of those nights.

I am a zone kind of guy, much more towards 3-2 because 2-3 is so susceptible to outside tactics. Last night is a case where a zone might have helped, yes you lose a little on the boards with a 3-2 but drives tend to get challenged by bigs and outside shots by guards so I am of the view that it is better to play more station to station because in m2m mismatches generally are more easily exploited. And 3-2 still gives acceptable defense against inside tactics. As it was though I would envision a night where the defense is sagging back to protect the lane and the opponent just drills outside shots against guys who are out of position to close out on the shooters.

In the end, it could have been won, but probably not. But getting thumped like a watermelon at a memorial day weekend picnic is significantly below average.

Last edited by Coach Lambini at 05/29/2018 14:17:02

This Post:
44
292200.11 in reply to 292200.10
Date: 05/29/2018 14:45:51
Overall Posts Rated:
142142
Aren't you fun, being the drunk guy on the 300 level yelling "You suuuuck!!" at the coach during a loss.

I'm not one to be a blanket apologist for all of Sahand's decisions, but I can tell you that whether you agree with them or not, they are well thought out, reasoned, and available on Discord the weekend before the game for any and all to comment on. Sahand has shown a willingness to listen and even change his strategy based on community input. If you want to actually effect change in the program I recommend getting on Discord and giving thoughts to the process. Less fun perhaps than having 20/20 hindsight, but then what is?

As far as the program in general, the rough consensus of those who have some knowledge of our roster options and that of other countries is currently the US has a talent gap vs the best 5-6 programs. Something that can't be fixed very quickly when players take 9-10 seasons to fully train, but that Sahand has said he's addressing via contacts with managers. I'm sure he can elaborate if you ask.


This Post:
44
292200.16 in reply to 292200.14
Date: 05/31/2018 13:53:25
Greensboro Generals
IV.2
Overall Posts Rated:
746746
I've seen some thin skinned people in my life but you come off like being made of origami, perhaps paper mache. Of course I try to light a little fire under some asses and I get whacked around like a Trump pinata at a DACA rally. But as Harry Truman would say if you cant stand the heat get out of the kitchen, well let's turn those burners up why don't we.

Then again you would have left me feeling a dog being popped upside the nose with a rolled up newspaper if you had just reminded me of my blunder from my cup match the very same night. Sometimes I've got a million dollar mouth and a ten cent head. But since you have in my view cherry picked and distorted my comments to suit your narrative allow me to retort.

1. I asked in a rhetorical manner if that was our best available team. I don't have access to the skills, I think it is a viable question. Then again I look at the roster and I see on the lower end some talents, one in particular, who have no real business being there..

2. See answer one. We might have three slots open, but in reality there are about 7 slots where one would think a appropriate talent could be available. Now if the pipeline is really that dry I can understand, but I have a hard time believing that is so. Plus for those managers who have talent who could be available for those call ups why would they feel any sort of motivation to put forth one shred of effort to do so for a management team that may, or may not even care about the effort. It's like being the woman expected to be on her lovers beckon call.

3. Oh you mean Hernandez at C and going patient? That's the oldest trick in the book. Actually your just as lucky it didn't blow up in your face. It can be a great move, but this game has a way of correcting those who jerk with the karma of fair play. It Probably was not necessary and one would think that for a still upper echelon program like ours that it was at the least a snarky move and at worst it is in my book dirty pool. And if that is the tact the community wants to take we can hand the reins to Hrudey and he can help us mass produce those style of players like a carpenter nails together 2x4's.

As for player ratings, yeah sure raw ratings may not reflect outward aspects like points, assists etc. But what it does show is how much the effort truly infuses the overall effort. Players who put up a great rating, but not in a manner reflective of the box score represent guys who are glue, Poland had guys who were rubber cement our guys were closers to Elmer's.


4. Only time is going to tell if your tenure does influence the future. It is not a question of what you know, it's a question of if you can get others to buy in. It is actually amazing I the program does as well as it does considering just how uninvolved the general population is when compared to the more consistent teams.

5. No you never promised a Rose garden, sure we may not win the argument but I expect a user pool of this size to do a better job of being part of the discussion.

Hey you have hardware. I am a ham and egger. Your truly a Great manager, without doubt. Training guru, so true, my training, let me put it this way, your players are like a soft pretzels just off the grill in the middle of New York, mine are more like the one I had last night down at Historic Grainger Stadium. Hey your efforts will probably bear a bountiful harvest. But we are Americans dagnabbit and we expect titles, not talk. Trust the process? Screw that, the future is now!





Last edited by Coach Lambini at 05/31/2018 14:46:52

From: Bob

This Post:
00
292200.18 in reply to 292200.17
Date: 07/25/2018 10:38:18
Overall Posts Rated:
142142
Thank you Falke! You were a quality candidate and I hope you find success what you choose to do next.

From: WardoYT

To: Bob
This Post:
00
292200.19 in reply to 292200.18
Date: 07/26/2018 18:28:56
Overall Posts Rated:
9595
Very winnable worlds . I am very excited about this hire we made. The good ole national team runs is coming back to life. Very excited about this new era. You can be something special and we all support you in every way possible.

Advertisement