BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > OD loophole fix

OD loophole fix

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
333100.20 in reply to 333100.19
Date: 10/14/2026 1:12:39 PM
Classics
IV.6
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Hello


Difference of. Opinions,

1. Building a well-rounded player who makes a manageable 65k a week will always outperform a bloated, one-dimensional 250k "OD/SB beast" that can't score a basket.

2. They are one-dimensional black holes that weigh the team down.

3. They are nothing more than transfer eye-candy models built for profit, not actual winning basketball.


You can't sit here and say you're training a PG/SF hybrid, and then turn around and claim we're having a genuine discussion about big man training. You're manipulating the argument.

Show me where I ever complained that my big men are getting torched. I'm telling you that you aren't training big men at all—you're training hybrid combo guards at a certain height, playing them out of position, and calling them "big men."

**I actually train real big men!**

I currently have players I trained leading the league in blocks per game, and *none* of them have 20 SB or 20 OD. There is zero need for it! Even if you have a guard with 20 JS and 20 JR, he turns into nothing more than a financial black hole if he's one-dimensional.

It feels a lot like exploiting a loophole when you see lower-potential players outshine higher-potential ones whose salaries are bloated with unneeded, single-dimensional stats. A balanced player will just be better, plain and simple.

It’s the exact same flawed advice as telling people "you need to tank to be successful." No, you don't!


This Post:
00
333100.22 in reply to 333100.21
Date: 10/14/2026 5:45:14 PM
Classics
IV.6
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Hello

I Appreciate the shoutout and the curated highlight reel of my quotes, but let's clear the air.

You're over here flexing a 1.8M transfer sale after 8 seasons like it's a mic drop. Meanwhile, I have 19-year-olds right now that match that exact market value—except I'm actually training them properly instead of just flipping hype. If it took you that long to get that kind of return, i dont think you want to go that route, in this discussion .

Stats are subjective to opponents and the teams , surrounding the player its all random, not mandatory


This Post:
00
333100.24 in reply to 333100.23
Date: 10/14/2026 9:11:57 PM
Classics
IV.6
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Hello

Look, you trained a player for 8 seasons for 1.8. I have a player at 19 with the exact same market value, and three others who will surpass that—all under 24.

I train big men. The difference between you and me is that I don't brag or belittle others. I put my information out on the forums to help more than most ever have here.

OD has never been a free skill. I can see it if we're talking free throws or stamina—something in that lane. Knect wants JR to be cheaper, but it will never happen, simply because it's a booster, not a sustainer.

This Post:
00
333100.26 in reply to 333100.25
Date: 10/15/2026 9:20:18 AM
Classics
IV.6
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Hello

The methods and playstyles you might question are what's taken me to three straight league championships

When every response feels like an insult, it makes it hard to want to share anything. Give me a reason to trust you with that information, why cant you figure it out yourself? Or haven’t.?

That's attitude right there is the problem: people want everything handed to them, treating it like a zero-sum game. None of this is hidden or secret, . The info is all over the old forums—you just have to put in the work and dig for it.

& No, Im not going give you a link or etc after you insult me over and over., kindly find it yourself. You have supporters.

Advertisement