Pros:
- The training of the young people would not mean a decrease in the competitiveness of the main team.
- The difficulty of the training would not change at all. It would only be progressive. The first year you would only have 3 trainables but after 4 years you would only be able to train 3/6 of the 12. I understand that this would help new users.
- The players would arrive at the main team with a potential performance that would not be a burden on competitiveness.
- Players over 22 years old could train more than now in the professional team, especially those who do not have maximum potential.
- Users could focus, if they want, on training the young people to the maximum in the university team regardless of whether they do not win and/or compete to the maximum in the professional team without being limited by the training of young people who have not yet performed at all. . Or continue as now.
Cons:
- By having two teams of coaches (university and professional), players could reach higher levels more quickly than now.
- It would force all users to carry two computers. If they want to optimize the training of the entire squad. (I think that the best players (Historical or Legend) would train the same as now and only mediocre players (All Star or Franchise Player) would benefit from that effect, therefore not being "mandatory" to have this second team)
- Being able to train on the one hand and continue competing at the same time could mean that the rotation of dominating teams in major competitions is not as fluid as it is now.