BuzzerBeater Forums

Hello

I think it should got to 22/23. Based on the point of view not enough time to develop a system of youth training.

U21 goes to 21 years old, this help develop better to the NT in small nation with lack of manager there. Doing this to 22/23 gives the boost to smaller nation to catch up, be competitive, enjoy the market. Like the rest of the thriving nation with hundreds of members and others to help create Valued youth market players for small nations

In a reasonable thought, What’s the point of home grown if you can only do it for 2 season with the prices of youth trainer . You either boost their performance to levels that break that game or you push it to go longer and lower the amount of training the Youth Player receives as they get older .

A lot bring up thing they see for their own favor, but they are not being fair to declining small nation talents. There no reason to support small nation youth or buy any, what can they create? as long point what you could create to benefit another nation, We call talk about speeding up training, I think its base cover to a lot things, that are irrelevant.

Training is not slow is a valid. Excuse folk make it be, the issue with training is how it structured with positional, nothing more or less.Training is based on sub level of player height and position .So the faster argument a lot make is something more of personal preference than a real issue.

I always thought that adding a U19 and a U23 team would make a lot of sense with the change in training speed. But that would require some other changes for the national teams as well.

Agreed,

But who is going to coach those teams? There is almost no interest in micro nation national teams right now.

Hello

That's a issue that was created by alot of things. I think the various La should be the coach of them.

More people are voting for the extend options than the no option. 21 and below should all be deemed youth. 18 to 21 are literally your standard college age athletes. Cutting off at 19 has never made sense especially since we cant even access the players until theyre already 18.

Either they should extend the players youth until 21 or start making 16 and 17 year olds draftable. Higher potential but lower starting tsp so the youth coaches make more sense.

Something else, National Youth teams are U-21. Youth coaches should be U-21, not simply 18 and 19 but oh no at 20 your ancient already

Your second short paragraph could be a good suggestion as well.