BuzzerBeater Forums

Nations of Asia - II.4 > Season 70

Favorite Folders

Season 70

Set priority
Show messages by
From: King187
This Post:
00
328994.1
Date: 10/15/2025 6:25:37 PM
South Stags
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
2222

Hi All,

This is an AI summary of our league:


๐Ÿ€ Abu Nzs PBC

Payroll: $302,637 total | $37,830 average (High-tier salaries, small roster)

Arena: 14,700 capacity, $236,580 max receipts

Summary: A small, high-paid team with solid earnings potential. Likely relies on top talent rather than squad depth. Mid-sized arena limits income compared to peers.

๐Ÿ€ Origami Fuji

Payroll: $85,708 total | $5,714 average (Low spending)

Arena: 6,488 capacity, $323,760 max receipts

Summary: Budget-friendly team with a small arena but surprisingly high per-seat revenue. Focuses on efficiency and tight cost control.

๐Ÿ€ Ace Rimmer

Payroll: $457,996 total | $35,230 average (Elite-tier salaries)

Arena: 31,550 capacity, $465,000 max receipts

Summary: Large, professional setup with one of the biggest arenas and a high payrollโ€”clearly a premier franchise aiming for both talent and crowd scale.

๐Ÿ€ Pull the Bully

Payroll: $267,571 total | $24,325 average (Mid-high range)

Arena: 12,520 capacity, $375,200 max receipts

Summary: Efficient mid-sized operation with strong revenue capacity compared to its spending. Solid financial balance.

๐Ÿ€ Huaw Kwang Bulls

Payroll: $233,917 total | $12,311 average

Arena: 8,189 capacity, $125,663 max receipts

Summary: Balanced but modest team with a small arena. Moderate investment level, community-based structure likely.

๐Ÿ€ Radioactive TOS-1

Payroll: $67,853 total | $2,950 average (Lowest in league)

Arena: 6,000 capacity, $79,480 max receipts

Summary: Low-budget team with minimal player expenses and small arena. Operates at the leagueโ€™s financial floor.

๐Ÿ€ ICL Champs

Payroll: $51,463 total | $5,146 average

Arena: 6,590 capacity, $190,600 max receipts

Summary: Economical team with low payroll but a surprisingly profitable arena setup. High revenue-to-salary ratio.

๐Ÿ€ Silverfoxes

Payroll: $435,173 total | $39,561 average (Top-tier spending)

Arena: 20,000 capacity, $344,700 max receipts

Summary: Veteran, star-studded team with a large, modern arena. Balanced between revenue and player investmentโ€”clear contender.

๐Ÿ€ Longhorns

Payroll: $402,655 total | $25,166 average

Arena: 14,570 capacity, $322,740 max receipts

Summary: Upper-middle team, solid pay structure and high attendance potential. Strong balance between performance and infrastructure.

๐Ÿ€ Soul Crushers

Payroll: $548,962 total | $36,597 average (Highest total payroll)

Arena: 23,692 capacity, $485,550 max receipts

Summary: The powerhouse franchiseโ€”top payroll and one of the biggest arenas. Aiming for dominance both on-court and financially.

๐Ÿ€ Orgram Dragon

Payroll: $141,538 total | $10,110 average

Arena: 21,550 capacity, $322,000 max receipts

Summary: Underinvested in players despite a massive arena. Strong business infrastructure but low roster spendingโ€”room for growth.

๐Ÿ€ South Stags

Payroll: $388,515 total | $29,886 average

Arena: 19,325 capacity, $400,500 max receipts

Summary: Well-balanced mid-to-high tier team with excellent crowd potential. Consistent financial and player investment.

๐Ÿ€ South Menace

Payroll: $89,528 total | $4,712 average

Arena: 6,134 capacity, $133,770 max receipts

Summary: Modest operation with limited payroll and smaller fan base. Likely focused on youth or development.

๐Ÿ€ Wellington Saints

Payroll: $171,967 total | $7,477 average

Arena: 13,000 capacity, $292,100 max receipts

Summary: Moderate payroll but good venue size. Traditional, stable club with strong crowd support potential.

๐Ÿ€ TN-NBA

Payroll: $186,047 total | $10,944 average

Arena: 8,910 capacity, $199,500 max receipts

Summary: Balanced mid-range team. Prudent financials, sustainable operationโ€”solid but unspectacular.

๐Ÿ€ ๆน˜ๅŒ—ๅญฆๅœ’ (Shohoku Academy)

Payroll: $260,074 total | $16,255 average

Arena: 13,100 capacity, $256,380 max receipts

Summary: Respectable mid-tier club with decent pay and strong atte

From: King187

This Post:
00
328994.2 in reply to 328994.1
Date: 10/15/2025 6:26:13 PM
South Stags
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
Cont.

โš–๏ธ Overall Observations

Highest Payroll: Soul Crushers ($548,962)

Lowest Payroll: ICL Champs ($51,463)

Largest Arena: Ace Rimmer (31,550 seats)

Smallest Arena: Radioactive TOS-1 (6,000 seats)

Most Financially Efficient: ICL Champs (High revenue, very low cost)

Top Revenue Potential: Soul Crushers ($485,550)

This Post:
00
328994.3 in reply to 328994.1
Date: 10/16/2025 2:55:22 AM
Huaw Kwang Bulls
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Wow amazing summary of the league ahaha. Its my second season but i played a lot of yeears ago to this game. The goal this season is try to survive but we will try to compete the best we can do. Good luck for everyone.

From: King187
This Post:
00
328994.4 in reply to 328994.1
Date: 11/10/2025 6:13:29 PM
South Stags
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
2222

โš™๏ธ 9. Huaw Kwang Bulls (4โ€“3) โ€” Grade: B-

Style: High-energy rebounders.
Summary: Outrebound everyone (+16 diff) but streaky scoring.
Strengths:

Rebounding monster

Decent shooting (45.4 FG%)

Star PF Sanjin Atiฤ‡ is elite two-way player
Weaknesses:

Inconsistent guards

Poor FT shooting (66%)
Outlook: Fringe playoff team with grit โ€” dangerous if they crash the glass.

โš™๏ธ 10. ๆน˜ๅŒ—ๅญฆๅœ’ (4โ€“3) โ€” Grade: C+

Style: Defensive purists, grind games to a crawl.
Summary: Strong rebounding (+19.2 diff) but lack shooting.
Strengths:

Best rebounders in the league

Force opponents into long possessions
Weaknesses:

Only 82.6 PPG (2nd-worst offense among winning teams)

Turnover-prone (-6.1 diff)
Outlook: Could upset better teams by controlling tempo, but lacks scoring punch.

โš™๏ธ 11. Wellington Saints (2โ€“5) โ€” Grade: C

Style: Solid fundamentals, mediocre results.
Summary: Underachieving team โ€” balanced numbers, small negative PD (-14).
Strengths:

43.9 FG%, competitive in most games

Excellent FT shooting (86.2%)
Weaknesses:

-7.3 rebound diff

No consistent playmaker
Outlook: Respectable but directionless; likely to finish mid-table.

โŒ 12. Orgram Dragon (2โ€“5) โ€” Grade: D

Style: Disorganized run-and-gun.
Summary: Offense misfires (77.9 PPG) and defense collapses (117.7 allowed).
Strengths:

Some size (+3.3 PF diff suggests physicality)
Weaknesses:

-17 rebound diff, -12 assist diff

Weak defensive rotations
Outlook: Needs a reset; raw talent with no system.

โŒ 13. Origami Fuji (1โ€“6) โ€” Grade: D

Style: Chaos.
Summary: Gives up 104 PPG, only scores 81. Little ball control or structure.
Strengths:

Modest offensive talent (33% 3P%)
Weaknesses:

-12 rebound diff

-11.1 assist diff
Outlook: Rebuilding year. Too inconsistent to threaten anyone.

๐Ÿ’€ 14. ICL Champs (1โ€“6) โ€” Grade: D-

Style: Undersized, overwhelmed.
Summary: Worst offense (65 PPG), second-worst defense (117 allowed).
Strengths:

Low salary ($51k total) โ€” cheap experiment
Weaknesses:

No inside presence

-16.6 rebound diff, -10 turnover diff
Outlook: Basically a development team.

๐Ÿ’€ 15. South Menace (0โ€“7) โ€” Grade: F

Style: Undersized, no defense.
Summary: -56.5 point differential, giving up 133 PPG.
Strengths:

Cheap to run
Weaknesses:

Everything else: rebounding, defense, shooting
Outlook: Bottom-tier โ€” total rebuild needed.

โ˜ ๏ธ 16. Radioactive TOS-1 (0โ€“7) โ€” Grade: Fโ€“

Style: Historically bad.
Summary: 41.7 PPG, 123 allowed, โ€“187 efficiency diff.
Strengths:

None statistically measurable
Weaknesses:

Every category
Outlook: In full implosion. Statistically one of the worst teams ever.

From: King187

This Post:
00
328994.5 in reply to 328994.4
Date: 11/10/2025 6:13:43 PM
South Stags
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
๐Ÿ€ LEAGUE POWER RANKINGS
๐Ÿฅ‡ 1. Soul Crushers (7โ€“0) โ€” Grade: A+

Style: Ruthless, balanced dominance.
Summary: The undisputed #1. Best record, best defense (71.7 PPG allowed), and the highest effective efficiency differential (+90.1). Their offense hums at 112 PPG with elite rebounding and playmaking.
Strengths:

+11.5 rebound diff (league-best)

Deep salary structure ($545k total) supports multiple stars

Top players: Nifantiev (SG), Herzog (C), Jusuf (PF) โ€” a true โ€œbig threeโ€
Weaknesses:

FT% only average (69.4%)

Can get turnover-happy in faster-paced games
Outlook: Clear championship favorite; anything less than the title is a failure.

๐Ÿฅˆ 2. Ace Rimmer (5โ€“2) โ€” Grade: A

Style: Offensive juggernaut, shoot-first mentality.
Summary: #1 offense at 126.4 PPG with an absurd 50.6 FG%. They bury teams early but occasionally coast on defense.
Strengths:

+17.4 rebound diff, +6.1 turnover diff

Highest EFFG (168.9)

Georgizas (SG) is league MVP frontrunner
Weaknesses:

Streaky defense โ€” allows 86.4 PPG

Reliant on hot shooting nights
Outlook: If they tighten up transition defense, they could dethrone Soul Crushers.

๐Ÿฅ‰ 3. Longhorns (6โ€“1) โ€” Grade: A

Style: Clinical and complete.
Summary: Excellent balance across all phases. Top-tier assist numbers, a smart half-court offense, and deep rotation (16 players).
Strengths:

+6.1 assist diff

+80.5 EFFG diff

Multiple elite guards: Minarik, Katz, Cooper
Weaknesses:

Occasionally undersized defensively

High payroll ($402k) but worth it
Outlook: Built for a long playoff run. Could outlast flashier teams with consistency.

๐Ÿ… 4. Abu Nzs PBC (5โ€“2) โ€” Grade: A-

Style: Efficient inside-out basketball.
Summary: Excellent two-way balance with the leagueโ€™s third-highest PPG (116.6) and top-5 defense.
Strengths:

+15.3 rebound diff

Strong shooting inside (52.1 FG%)

Tight salary control โ€” only 7 players, $297k
Weaknesses:

FT% (61.1) and bench depth are concerns
Outlook: A โ€œdark horseโ€ contender. One injury away from trouble but top-tier when healthy.

๐Ÿ€ 5. Pull the Bully (5โ€“2) โ€” Grade: B+

Style: Physical slashers with defensive grit.
Summary: Tough and unpredictable. 114 PPG but sometimes inefficient (25.5 3P%).
Strengths:

Great interior defense

Balanced roster with steady C production (Hicham El Yazghi, Ky Bentick)
Weaknesses:

-1.8 assist diff, inconsistent spacing
Outlook: Capable of an upset run; offense must find rhythm vs elite defenses.

๐Ÿ€ 6. Silverfoxes (5โ€“2) โ€” Grade: B+

Style: Veteran savvy with discipline.
Summary: Old-school, controlled tempo team. Lower PPG (101) but elite FG% defense (44.6).
Strengths:

+10 rebound diff, +3.5 EFF diff

Compact salary ($386k for 7 players)
Weaknesses:

Depth and age โ€” legs might fade late in season
Outlook: A playoff lock that can suffocate high-scoring opponents.

๐Ÿ€ 7. TN-NBA (5โ€“2) โ€” Grade: B

Style: Low-cost, high-efficiency fundamentals.
Summary: A team that punches above its budget. 104 PPG on $12k average salary is elite return on value.
Strengths:

+49.1 EFF diff

Few turnovers (+6.3 diff)

Discipline: 15.9 PFPG (low)
Weaknesses:

No clear superstar

Limited offensive weapons beyond starting five
Outlook: Best bang-for-buck team in the league; playoff sleeper.

๐Ÿ€ 8. South Stags (4โ€“3) โ€” Grade: B

Style: Grit and grind, half-court defense.
Summary: Methodical team that wins through effort and interior control.
Strengths:

+7.6 rebound diff

Strong interior D (81 PPG allowed)

Stars: Antolรญ Montaner (C), Walter Gaiteri (PF), John Schwarz (SG)
Weaknesses:

99 PPG offense limits ceiling

Needs more perimeter shooting
Outlook: If their bigs dominate, they can frustrate faster teams in playoffs.

From: Humbuk

This Post:
00
328994.6 in reply to 328994.5
Date: 11/17/2025 1:03:01 PM
Pull the Bully
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
Second Team:
Maunga Battlers
Might need to revisit these power rankings.

I like the write up though! Awesome stuff keep it going.