BuzzerBeater Forums

I'm sorry that my language was offensive, I should be more sensitive.

But, I feel like your first paragraph seems to indicate that you didn't really listen to my point about the best players in the world. Given that we have chosen to have a game with a tiered economic system, we cannot have players getting better over time, and getting paid more over time for those increased skills, and have a system where it makes sense for a team to have a "long-term plan to build a key player" because eventually if the team is in a lower division, that player will cost too much for them to afford.. regardless of the salary tuning formula... which again ... was 5-10% depending on salary level (lower for lower salaries/lower divisions). The vast majority of salary increases this season are due to training, not due to this salary formula adjustment.

So that's not really the best representative of what percentage of income is spent on expenses. Spending 70% per week during the regular might seem conservative, but if you include the offseason weeks that jumps to 90%.

2 things, 1... 22 weeks of regular season >> 2 weeks of offseason. 2 earlier in the season there are teams in the cup which are going to raise revenue, and actually 3 in the first week you also have promotion bonuses etc.. so yes.. during the offseason teams are losing money, but those couple weeks of lower revenue are offset by other factors throughout the season.

Last edited by BB-Forrest at 3/26/2010 10:37:53 AM

I agree that there is other income from cup games, playoff games, promotion bonus, etc. When I'm trying to plan for the season I don't want to count on those as income since they aren't assured.

For this season my salaries are up to 650k from 475k from last season. When I plot out a baseline of income based on 11 home games, and 14 weeks of all the other incomes/expenses (barring a drastic increase/decrease in TV money) I've come to the conclusion that to break even I need to:

- at least finish 2nd in my conference AND make it to the SF
- make it to at least round 8 of the cup

Those are realistic based on performance, but they are not assured. I think this is probably a good exercise for managers to take before they decide how much salary they can carry. I'm not saying it's wrong to be aggressive, but if you at least know what you're committing to then it won't hurt as much if you're forced to shed salaries in a declining market.

Last edited by brian at 3/26/2010 10:51:29 AM

I really didn't consider your post a yell... and when i said .. i think you are being a bit too unkind... that was really not meant in an aggressive tone, though i can see how it could be read that way. I think you are generally pretty reasonable, but I thought you were maybe forgetting some of the changes we have made over the last 4 seasons.

I see your point, that you wish you could play a game in which you had to think about the money less, and I could imagine a game in which we made the economics totally flat across the board, had a global salary cap tied to the global level of salaries, no modulation of income with success etc, but I think at this point it would be impossible to make buzzerbeater into that game... and I do think the economic complexity makes the game more dynamic in some good ways. We want there to be an economic incentive to advance, we want to avoid teams avoiding winning their division in order to continue to be successful. We could distill all the tradeoffs into the ones about choosing to build this sort of team versus this sort, and choosing this tactic versus this one, but I personally like the fact that there are too many tradeoffs to make it difficult to write down a globally optimum strategy, and the interplay of an economic system makes it very much unclear whether there even is a global optimum which is independent of the state of the all the rest of the world's strategies.

I hear you!

I agree with LA-Emilio about the small/big country different economic situation. Appreciating there is an interested BB audience in Macau/Barbados/Jamaica even Japan, it is obvious that teams are playing a very different game when they sign up to those that start their BB career in a Spain/France/Germany.

With a growing userbase and so many contrasting and conflicting opinions of the changes you impose you are likely never going to satisfy everyone. I still maintain that structuring the BB-world into regions and merging countries so that they have as close to equal users and leagues will make future decisions much easier but I do also appreciate that this would make many of the games facets obsolete and lead to even less alternatives to build your team successfully.

Season 12 is almost upon us... time to let the players do the talking on the court...... have a great season everyone!!

the problem of course is that neither charles nor I speak spanish. We could try to have a google translate dialog...but I think that generally is a bad idea as both sides get misinterpreted.

As an silly example, most of your contests giving Free-Supporter prizes are actually reserved to english speaking participants

I don't really think this is the case, but regardless, we have big plans for some contests this spring and summer that will definitely be geared to a more worldwide audience than, say, the NCAA Tournament contest.