BuzzerBeater Forums

ok if a player for goes for 25- 10- 9 and has bench warmer potential, and 6.1 level starter. .Another player is 1 pt 4 rebs 1 ast and is Goat potential 7''2 and current level Hof..

So You look at them the same is stats ( meaningless), and pick off the potential. so the 7'2 guy is better.? correct

I understand the concept and why it like that. ( make it a guessing games with rewards, game balancing) But I think the better player should perform better in talent searches and scrimmages.. based off the scrimmages I would take the 1st guy with a feeling that he could do that in games.These are pro work scrimmages and colleges games. manager are already paying million towards these players.* please note I know the 7'2 player is the better choice* just giving a common point of view*

This system is kinda like kwame brown and Tyson chandler, sam bowie and Michael Jordan... micheal Jordan was no sam bowie in college.. same bowie was better all around thus being the 1st pick in the draft because of positive outputs draft work outs, Kwame brown killed tyson chandler in pro workout in games leading to the draft.. but in the end Jordan and chandler where the better players on upside hidden potentials none knew.



Last edited by Mr. Glass at 5/1/2013 10:20:25 PM

I just was saying saying its misleading somewhat If look at from a angle. But I understand why it like that..

ok

If the stats in box score for one game are not accurate, then BB could introduce an option: Spend another 2 points, to obtain average stats when they played in high school.

This could be more accurate.

Btw, are there draftees with more balls in potential, than skill balls?

Of course they exist.
For example:
(29013383)

I guess he is an example: (28725960)