BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Australia > U21 National Team Debate Thread

U21 National Team Debate Thread (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
312962.18 in reply to 312962.17
Date: 01/15/2022 08:58:15
rimmers
III.2
Overall Posts Rated:
438438
Second Team:
Redbacks
I like secondaries and salary efficiency, but at some point I need to advise for high primaries to do the u21 job properly. I've been following up on high potential u21 yr olds after their u21 campaign to advise for secondaries at 22-23yrs to catch them up a bit where primaries might have had more attention at 21yrs. This way players can have the best of both worlds- u21 and secondaries/ salary efficiency. Above all though I'm happy to suggest both options to owners, get a gauge on what the manager wants and go from there.

This Post:
00
312962.19 in reply to 312962.17
Date: 01/15/2022 09:27:23
Croissant
Serie A
Overall Posts Rated:
301301
Second Team:
the Rick-counters of the Rick Kind
Very interesting question, unfortunately the u21 world is dominated by triskill bigman (Center with IS 17+ ID 17+ and RB 14+ that cost around 80-100k), so if i had to chose between a 17-17-14-10 (IS-ID-RB-SB) with no secondaries or a 15-15-12-8 with 10+ in JS-HN-DR and decent OD and PA, I would probably go with the first one
But simply cause with the enormous pool of players that Italy has, we were lucky enough to have the opportunity of "testing" both out, and the guy with more primaries was simply better.
Obviously things would change if i had a guy like Mastrodonato, who was 17-17-15-10 guy with 11 JS and 11 DR, although we had Padula and Stefanelli with more inside skills, Mastrodonato was a nailed on starter every time he was in decent GS.

With this being said, I wouldn't force anything, I would layout to the manager multiple training plans, the pros and cons of each one and I would let him decide what path he'd like to take

On exterior players (PG and SG) you don't have this problem since my players rarely have huge salaries, and it's easier for them to be balanced since 1on1 provides a good amount of IS training