And because this discussion is all about long term planning with training lets see its perspective with one dimensional training regime. The idea is to reach to a certain value of skills for a player the fastest you can, and there are different opinions whether the EE will lead you there. Basically, I share the idea of B.B.King
(197824.4). Now, let's see how the cross-training adds to that.
IMO, the cross-training can be a real headache with it's potent randomness. It's really a question how much randomness you are willing to afford. If you are a perfectionist, I'd say you will always try to stay close to the 90%. One-dimensional training for the purpose of gaining huge EE could produce cross-training share of ____ %. For a player:
JS 14 JR 7
OD 7 HN 14
DV 14 PA 7
IS 1 ID 1
RB 1 SB 1
how much % does fall to the random training if you continue with the 1-on-1? We certainly know it is more that 10%. Could it be 20% with these set of skills? If we say it is, what is the training speed of 1on1 in the next week?
base speed x negative elastic effect x 0.8?
Obviously you will be training 1on1 slower, but the bigger problem for me is that ___ % of cross-training. For a manager that cares very much of total skill points vs potential vs salary this is probably not the most desired outcome.
Last edited by Onisifor at 10/11/2011 10:37:28 AM