BuzzerBeater Forums

Canada - I.1 > Season 27!

Season 27!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
257222.38 in reply to 257222.36
Date: 4/24/2014 8:51:24 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Damn. It couldnt go any worse. Not only am I out of the cup (disaster for finances) but minute distribution got screwed because it went to OT. Looks like I overplayed my hand and trying to win all 3 games was just greedy.
3peat is out of a question now. Well, at least now I can focus on defending a championship. Still, the amount of 3 pointers he was able to score (including 2 within 12 seconds in OT when I had 5 point lead) was absolutely insane.

Congratulations to Superfreakys.

Last edited by damian13ster at 4/24/2014 8:52:51 PM

This Post:
00
257222.39 in reply to 257222.38
Date: 4/24/2014 9:32:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
B3 gets really tough, too.

RnG and 2-3 and CT are all ridiculously ballsy. Crazy. Maybe all 2-3 needs in order to work is a CT. Who knew?

Griffins are out too. Eek,

This Post:
00
257222.40 in reply to 257222.39
Date: 4/25/2014 1:36:54 AM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
yeah. still no idea how he shot 40% from 3. one less made and that would be a win for me. Oh well, good opponent and CT vs TIE can do that to you. About 500k lost because of that (depending from a draw) but I will manage

This Post:
11
257222.41 in reply to 257222.39
Date: 4/25/2014 12:39:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
Well superfreaky's have a pretty solid team. Playing crunch vs tie along with damian resting a few players was likely enough. It's possible that the tactics used didn't actually help and might have even hurt the freaky's cause.

This Post:
00
257222.42 in reply to 257222.41
Date: 4/26/2014 12:54:54 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Yeah, superfreaky's look really solid for their salary. I didn't mean to say the result was weird, just the process. RnG is always iffy and 2-3 is generally a bad FG% defence. The 2-3 seemed to "work" regardless of effort. Kinda interesting.

This Post:
00
257222.43 in reply to 257222.42
Date: 4/26/2014 11:43:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7070
Well - I finally broke the goose egg, (party)I can at least say "I won one game in the Naismith" - never mind it was against a bot - it is still a win. The monkey is off my back - now I can lose the rest of the games with a clean conscience. :D

This Post:
00
257222.44 in reply to 257222.41
Date: 4/27/2014 12:50:58 AM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Dont know if tactics helped or not, they didnt hurt, thats for sure. It was a bit freaky though watching him make 3 after 3 on an unusual rate, especially 2 withing 12 seconds in overtime against my best defenders. Ratings and ppp100 didnt point his way either. It was all effort and bit of a luck factor. Not being butthurt about it though. You gamble and you win some and you lose some. I dont really care that much about my finances (wouldnt be able to strengthen my team for BBB anyway and I am not going bankrupt) and have already won the cup twice. Now what I really want is at least quarters in BBB and league championship. Winning it once is nice but solidifying yourself as best in the country is something I want to do before focusing on training again (although I could keep my team at the same strength for couple of more seasons I am not sure if I prefer that over training homegrown talent)

From: Stajan
This Post:
00
257222.45 in reply to 257222.1
Date: 5/6/2014 10:43:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Feels good to have inside iso played against me. I've used it about 20 times overall and have been confused and repulsed by how awful it is every single time. I can just about confirm it doesn't play off player IS/HND/DRV or opponent ID/IS at all. So frustrating because it sounds like such a good offence, yet the shot quality is inexplicably dreadful. So broken.

Laurent, Worley, Gaudreault 12-50 FG is laughable. Terrible game for all NT players that game with 20-90 FG.





This Post:
00
257222.46 in reply to 257222.45
Date: 5/6/2014 11:10:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
My impression of inside iso when I've used it is that it works best when your bigs have high passing because then the seem to throw the ball back out for open jumpshots. I'm guessing the theory here is they get double teamed on the play and somebody is open. It still sucks, but that's the only time I thought it was semi effective.

Looks like a got shut out on the 3rd quarter tonight, I knew playing base offense was a mistake...

Last edited by Beener not Beanerz at 5/6/2014 11:11:48 PM

This Post:
00
257222.47 in reply to 257222.45
Date: 5/7/2014 7:51:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
Ya, inside ISO is horrible.

I thought high passing was important but apparently not. My bigs and SF have great passing and had one of the worst performances I have seen.

Honestly it was not a game I expected to win so it was a bit of an experiment. An experiment that will never be repeated.

This Post:
00
257222.48 in reply to 257222.47
Date: 5/7/2014 10:24:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
My PG that match (who defended SF) is high OD. My PF is quite high too. My ID, on the other hand, isn't that strong. My ID and REB ratings lie and I'm kinda perplexed by it. If inside iso worked as described, you'd have killed me (unless I used the same offence).

I'm going to stubbornly continue using inside iso from time to time. Prepared to be so disappointed each time.

Advertisement