BuzzerBeater Forums

Canada - I.1 > Season 24!

Season 24!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
243266.51 in reply to 243266.50
Date: 6/25/2013 12:30:29 PM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
311311
I agree, if you had put your best lineup you would have won that game, and I'm going back to passing training so I was fortunate to pick up a win there. However, I think the rebounding edge had more to do with the fact my players have much better rebounding than your players, particularly when the positions matched up (ie. Main's 17 over Arsenault's 15 is a big advantage). And I don't think this is an indication that inside offense is better than outside offense, but your team isn't built for a motion offense.

This Post:
00
243266.52 in reply to 243266.51
Date: 6/25/2013 12:59:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
I tried the same thing last season. Same result. (55983108)

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
00
243266.53 in reply to 243266.52
Date: 6/25/2013 1:12:13 PM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
311311
Those 2 games should be a lesson for my opponents, don't play Motion against me. :)

This Post:
00
243266.54 in reply to 243266.50
Date: 6/25/2013 1:56:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
455455
Increasing SB only solves a small part of the LI dominance problem. Teams still aren't going to succeed playing outside attacks if the top 3 point shooters are making only 20-30% of their attempts.

Last edited by Beener not Beanerz at 6/25/2013 1:57:51 PM

This Post:
00
243266.55 in reply to 243266.51
Date: 6/25/2013 9:48:30 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
actually my team is built for motion offence. It is just not built for defence when I am not craming on the inside. Princeton has similar results. I am going to continue testing despite those results

This Post:
00
243266.56 in reply to 243266.55
Date: 6/25/2013 11:43:45 PM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
311311
I don't think Bradshaw has enough rebounding to be playing that position without expecting to have him lose the rebounding on a nightly basis by a lot. I think once you're done training REB, he will be in the future, just can't expect to win regularly with him there now.

This Post:
00
243266.57 in reply to 243266.49
Date: 6/25/2013 11:53:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
774774
*sigh* I hate reporting wins for Kumiko

And what is that supposed to mean mister? ;)

If you remember me, then I don't care if everyone else forgets.
This Post:
11
243266.58 in reply to 243266.56
Date: 6/26/2013 9:41:20 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
he doesnt, and he will never have enough RB for a PF, but unfortunately that is a cost of training. He has to play there, but it is a good opportunity to test outside offences

This Post:
00
243266.59 in reply to 243266.58
Date: 7/9/2013 4:54:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
44
Just logged in for the first time in...well...a while because I got a few emails saying I was going bankrupt/inactive.

Selling all my players. Might return to BB to play competively again, but for now I'm tanking.

This Post:
00
243266.60 in reply to 243266.59
Date: 7/16/2013 12:53:06 AM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
well, I think its time to make it official (if there really is a need :D ). I am going for it all next 2 seasons. After that I will consider my options

This Post:
00
243266.61 in reply to 243266.60
Date: 7/16/2013 8:21:13 AM
Syndicalists' BC
Naismith
Overall Posts Rated:
311311
I'm wishing you luck for this season, because I'm hoping to get one of the B3 qualifying spots next season. Although for me, I guess I'll have to see how well Chung ends up doing in my lineup; his ratings have been great, but his numbers have been a disappointment so far for the amount I spent on him.

Advertisement