BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - IV.49 > BB Strategy Stuff

BB Strategy Stuff

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Sindy

This Post:
00
186352.8 in reply to 186352.7
Date: 6/2/2011 12:11:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
Oh, I think you should train your best players to make them even better, and I'm not suggesting you train a different 5 guys every week or anything like that. My comparison was between between having 5-7 prolific players (including some you buy) vs. 2-3 wondrous guys and 9 average guys. The latter has exploitable holes, and is vulnerable to people choosing defenses against those particular players. And there's a higher salary cost. Anyway, I'm sharing what's working for me, and working pretty reasonably so far I think, to be where I am in my 3rd full season. Hopefully there is more than one way to win in this game.

I also think it's more fun to play guys who have been on your team for a while, and much more fun to see people pop in training when you know you're going to keep them. YMMV -- I'm sure for some people the big thrill is selling a player for millions. Or having someone on the NT. Or lighting up the league leader board. That's a prejudice that has nothing to do with strategy.

This Post:
00
186352.9 in reply to 186352.8
Date: 6/2/2011 3:27:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
Nice! You hit on my favorite part of BB . . . that there are so many ways to be 'successful'. And I mean that in two ways; first, there is definitely no single strategy that will get a team to the highest levels - which means that a manager must consider all of the variables (players ages, skill levels, level of competition within the division / league, etc, etc, etc) to be successful over the long haul. Additionally, there are soooo many potential goals to go after. For me, I would absolutely love to get an 18 yo MVP or higher and develop him into a U21 player and a NT player. I think that would be really neat. Other managers could not care less if they have an NT player.

When there are so many ways to set goals and then work to achieve them, everyone seems to be involved. I think that some of the people that try BB and drop out do so because there is SO MUCH to the game. Not that it is complex, but that there are so many things that you could do (build a massive bankroll, win the Cup, get to the NBBA, win B3, become a NT manager, and so on). All those possibilities could be a bit overwhelming.


This Post:
00
186352.10 in reply to 186352.9
Date: 6/2/2011 3:27:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
The other topic that your guys are hitting on is a tough one . . . the Studs & Scrubs strategy vs. Stud & Subs strategy. Again, there are a lot of considerations that go into what is 'right' for any particular team (current payroll, current cash, what could player bring to the team, training, level of doctor, and so on).

When I made my roster changes last week, here is what I was thinking (part of it is relevant to this topic). Looking at my roster, I was at a point that I needed to either continue training guards, or shift to training bigs. If guards, then I would have sold Weltmann and Jones and probably picked up about $1M Going that way, I would have used the cash to get 1 or 2 bigs that were good enough to get me at least through the next 3 seasons without training them at all. Gruttadauria is great, and Dunn and Rangelov are incredible backups . . . but they are 32, 30 and 34. I would need 2 players to come into the lineup as they start to lose skill points. If I would have done that, I would then have focused exclusively on Subasi for the next two seasons. The problem with that plan would have been that Del Real and Santamarina were great offensive players . . . but they were not strong enough defensively to help in the next couple seasons.

I decided that focusing on bigs makes a lot more sense, because I knew I could get some cash for Subasi, Del Real and Santamarina (actually I ended up getting much more for the latter two then I thought I would). I then took the cash and purchased players who were skilled enough in OD, passing and JS to start on the DIII level . . . that way I don't need to worry about training them at all. Casanavate, Raden and Snut are older players . . . but between the three of them, Ghitti, Coroado and Jones I should have the guard and Sf positions covered for several seasons. Finally, knowing that I am focused on training Weltmann and Jones this year and next, I found a couple young high potential players that I will work into training so I can sell them for a profit later. Vazgelevious and Seward may not be on any national teams soon . . but I will probably be able to turn a 500K profit on them in two seasons.

Was the purchase of Casnavate, Raden AND Snut overkill when I know that Ghitti is an A+ starter for the next 4 seasons? Probably. But I don't want to run the risk of having 1 or 2 (or God forbid 3) injuries hit my squad during a run at possible promotion. I have a lot invested in my current run, and I want to have the depth and flexibility to deal with injuries, another team buying 2 100K salary studs, etc.

That said . . . at the end of next season, I will be done training Weltmann and Jones (Weltmann will be going on 25 and Jones only has allstar potential). So I will be making another similar decision at that time (which will make Vaz and Seward all the more important from a financial perspective).