BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > JS Training suggestion

JS Training suggestion

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Aris
This Post:
00
328118.1
Date: 7/11/2025 8:03:48 AM
Aris BB
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
162162
Second Team:
King of the Desert
Hello guys,

For most training sessions, we can move players around for a slightly lower efficiency, e.g. we can train OD in SG for 90% efficiency,

Similarly, could we split JS guards and JS forwards training in two different trainings ? And let's say we could train JS forwards in SG/SF position for 90% (that already exists for 1o1) and PG/SG for 80% ?

Poll:  What's your opinion on this ?
Good idea
Bad idea
Neither - explain in comments

This Post:
00
328118.2 in reply to 328118.1
Date: 7/11/2025 9:40:55 AM
QQguest
I.1
Overall Posts Rated:
321321
Would this cause confusion?
There might be two trainings for the same position, and it's unclear which one is which.


Last edited by little Guest at 7/11/2025 9:46:35 AM

From: Big city

To: Aris
This Post:
00
328118.3 in reply to 328118.1
Date: 7/12/2025 7:44:49 PM
Classics
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
1919
Your question is the same thing.

I think Js is more important than OD. But that just my bias opinion.

From: Aris

This Post:
00
328118.4 in reply to 328118.3
Date: 7/12/2025 9:42:11 PM
Aris BB
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
162162
Second Team:
King of the Desert
My point is we can train every skills out of position for a lower % efficiency (90, 80, 70 or 60%) except for the JS wingman which is the only JS training training slightly IS

But the poll is unequivocal unless I've misspoken