BuzzerBeater Forums

Hey, thanks for taking the time to share your ideas but unfortunately there is absolutely no way your approach actually works. The reason is simple: with the current market, you would be happy to sell the 12-10-10 players that you describe for 100k$. I don't know where your $400k - $700k estimate comes from but certainly not from observing the transfer market.

Hello

"Hey, appreciate your input, but it seems you're overlooking the player's star potential as an base offense guard. With the right potential, these players can definitely fetch $400k-$700k. That's actually a bargain for a top-notch guard. Maybe revisit the numbers and consider the player's ceiling?"

I'm showing a way to create players. In Market filled with one thing . I don't see where it can't work.?

Hello,

I hear what you’re saying, and I definitely appreciate the perspective of someone who has put in the work. There is a massive difference between talking about the "ideal" build and actually getting into the weeds to produce four players with 100+ TSP before they even hit 23. Which I have done since I have been here. The guide is not hard to understand.. MyThat’s a serious track record that speaks for itself.

It’s true that while some might focus on the theory(which I do not ), you’re looking at the actual results on the court., my court is data not anything else. My goal isn’t to talk down to anyone or ignore the grind it takes to hit those benchmarks; it’s to provide a space where that kind of high-level experience can be shared. I’m always open to being corrected by someone who is actually out there hitting those development targets. I don't see any post from you on that aspect . So what are you correcting me. For the sake of arguing, or shall I say belittling you have not built ? Post is proof.


To make sure we’re looking at the right blueprint, what training focus or specific skill-set did you prioritize to get those 100+ TSP players developed so early? Like I have which is open sharing format .Keep in no mind two players are the same .

To play the game is one thing,to criticize a trainer is another . Kindly. Show us your format ? Not a insult, I think it fair Or. Do I have to buy supporters to see your threads.




I

Last edited by Big city at 3/16/2026 1:53:16 PM

Hello
Kindly Mr Egm



"His claim doesn't hold up without data to back it. I've posted specifics about the player's superstar potential and how to build it , and as an EGM, You know the TSP caps at 100 at 23 years old. I'm doing it right now, so it's 100% accurate. I'd love to see some factual data supporting his position. If not, let's focus on contributing to the discussion rather than speculating and taking sides.

The data I post above is correct for base tactical point guard . At highest level in potential 400k + is the selling price.

Hello


"Hey, let's keep the discussion focused on building great players! This thread's about creating top-notch offense PGs in base offense , and I'd love to share and learn from data-driven insights so do.many other in need . If you're not interested in sharing or discussing specifics, no worries at all – let's keep the conversation helpful for those who are interested. 😊"

Thank you

Last edited by Big city at 3/17/2026 3:46:08 PM

High value is not important in building base offensive guard players, not the purpose of the thread . .

If you train correctly there no big salary even at highest levels of the game. . It's about balance . It's marathon not sprint

If you can kindly go to my starting post of this thread,, that's training data. It shows you how to build the players for cheap.

Last edited by Big city at 3/17/2026 9:03:59 PM