BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > S73 - BB-Marin Q&A

S73 - BB-Marin Q&A

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
332391.44 in reply to 332391.42
Date: 8/6/2026 2:19:26 PM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14511451
A: The second update mostly did two things: lower the cost of OD for guards, increase the cost of IS and SB for guards and SFs. Other positions stayed basically the same.


Last answer should be ID not OD right? To avoid more confusion.

Last edited by Jeründerbar at 8/6/2026 5:41:17 PM

From: knecht

This Post:
1919
332391.45 in reply to 332391.44
Date: 8/6/2026 2:50:34 PM
Legion X
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
124124
Honestly, I think these changes are a real step backward for BB. You misidentified the actual "loopholes" and ended up baking in new imbalances instead — making OD even cheaper, for example. Have fun tuning a system that used to be flawed and is now broken, for the next 20 years.

By introducing facilities, you opened a door that led to these bizarre player builds. Looking at Austria's national team player requirements gives me a headache — in real life, players like that show up once in a generation, but in BB every national team player has to be a hybrid of LeBron and Jokic, and thanks to the "natural" development of their FT skill - with the help of facilities - they're basically destined to end up as Steve Nasc-level free throw shooters.

TSP values above 130 shouldn't be possible, period. Same with skills above 20. I honestly don't get what the team was thinking. It's like Ferrari releasing an EV — and completely missing the point of the brand.

Lord of All the Beasts, Fishes & Hoes in the Milky Way aka Drip God from Vienna
Message deleted
From: LynxBK

This Post:
00
332391.47 in reply to 332391.36
Date: 8/6/2026 4:46:10 PM
Lynx Incubus
MKD BB Elita
Overall Posts Rated:
165165
Ty very kindly for your time to go over all questions posted here in the forum.
I was very surprised to learn OD got a discount for guards. Time for more Tony Allen's then.

Last edited by LynxBK at 8/6/2026 4:46:27 PM

This Post:
55
332391.48 in reply to 332391.45
Date: 8/6/2026 4:53:58 PM
Classics
IV.6
Overall Posts Rated:
9797
Hi Marin,

Thank you for taking the time to answer the community's questions and for continuing to engage with us on these updates.

As a newer manager stepping into this game, I’ve spent a lot of time reading the history on the forums. I am honestly so grateful and humbled to just walk in the lanes that this incredible community has spent decades paving and building. But looking at how things are being handled right now leaves me feeling genuinely sad for them and sad overall.

It feels a bit like a person making every single payment on a car for years, treating it like their own, only to have someone sneak up in the dead of night, take the keys back because "you didn't actually pay for it," and then tell them to "find a way to work." You hand out the keys and the sandbox to build these rosters, but without a full blueprint for every player type, the community had to reverse-engineer the math through sheer dedication no loop holes even if the player’s are kinda wacky. We all have to understand nothing by chance nothing is pure,. But To watch managers pour years of their lives into building amazing athletes, only for you to take the keys, wipe the drawing boards clean, and say "No, that's illegal/unrealistic, /abuse of code”—it just feels wrong.

Also, on the point of realism: given how long this game has been around, evolution is natural. Over time, evolution creates more refined, beautiful, and better versions of things. A lot of folks might say this new evolution of player costs less in some areas while delivering more overall value—and honestly, I don't see how a better, more evolved version of the game is a bad thing overall! But calling those master-crafted player builds "unrealistic" just doesn't sit right when that progression is the natural result of struggle throughout the years of game age minds within the community and evolution of it.

I understand you missed or skipped a couple of the tougher tactical questions, but that's okay—the under-the-hood math is deeply complex.

Thank you again for your time, your patience, and for keeping the game moving forward. It's a wonderful world to step into, even if the garage feels a little colder tonight.

Last edited by Big city at 8/6/2026 4:57:34 PM

This Post:
00
332391.53 in reply to 332391.44
Date: 8/7/2026 3:12:40 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36973697
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Yes, ID not OD, sorry. Edited it now.

From: CoachP

This Post:
88
332391.54 in reply to 332391.53
Date: 8/7/2026 8:11:29 AM
Corntucky Mildcats
III.5
Overall Posts Rated:
162162
Second Team:
Winchester Crows
"Marin why using discord instead the official page to comunicate with the users?
A: Discord is a modern chat option, one of many used by most companies to talk to their customers. It is more convenient and is a standard today. When we build an in-website alternative that's good enough, we can switch back. In the meantime, we will try to keep the forums alive too."

The BB teams's responsibility is to the entire user base. Never once was it mentioned that all future official game news will be posted on Discord first. This website is outdated, yes, fair, but it is still the team's job to ensure as many users see official news as possible. The old site is not an excuse to ignore this basic responsibility. Nothing was posting in News until yesterday. Nothing was posted on the landing page, manage my team page, or training page. I am sure Justin may even have stickied a note in the app if you asked him to.

Foto reposted Discoed stuff here in the forums and says he will continue to do so. That is appreciated but its also the bare minimum. His first thread wasnt even pinned or labeled official or anything.

Q1: Do you think the team did a good job communicating this massive news to as many users as possible? with time for them to prepare?

Q2: Why is the team so averse to a 3-5 season roadmap? The logic that discord is "industry standard" hence why it was used, is fine logic. But please use that same logic elsewhere. Roadmaps are industry standard. And in a game that is VERY long term, a loose roadmap with a general direction would help users relax and let them focus their mental energy elsewhere in the game.

Contrary to your claim, or a hasitly made poll, we like changes and have been clammoring for some of these for a long time. What users dont like, is a rugpull, or to feel like they were put in a disadvategous position through some form of negligence.

For a game this small and a team this small, comms should be better.



Advertisement