BuzzerBeater Forums

Agree that the current training system could use some changes. Currently you can realistically only train 2 players at once, 3 gets very tricky and 4+ means you're basically halving the training speed. This also means that it becomes almost pointless to invest in draft once you've found your 2-3 trainees and actually start trying to win games.

I wish that we could train every player's individual skill on a weekly basis without having them to play in a certain position.

Couldn't agree more!

Requirement can be that we have to hire more trainers and that every trainer can train max 3-4 players.

Either that or a system where you can train more players in total but only train 2-3 guys with max efficiency. Something like this:

Main focus - Train 2 players with 100% efficiency.

Secondary focus - Train 2 players with 50-75% efficiency.

Tertiary focus - Train 2 (or maybe up to 3-4) players with 30-40% efficiency.

The exact numbers could be discussed further. Maybe add a secondary trainer to slightly help those efficiencies.

In that way, you could give slower training to players with less potential - a player with a "Role player" potential could be exactly that, a role player for your needs.

It would make home-grown teams more viable and you could build the team exactly how you'd like, not needing to find a perfect fit for a team build you have in mind.


For individual focus for players - also not a bad idea. Hate to see my worst shooter think he's Kobe.

Hello

Honestly , the whole system would be so much better if they just did away with the rigid 48 minute rule altogether.

If a player gets out on the court and plays in a game, they should get their training, it really should be that simple. Let managers handle the actual training focus and intensity instead of forcing everyone to meticulously track minutes down to the exact second just to keep a player's form from tanking.

It also makes total sense to combine stamina and game shape into a single rating. Having them separated just creates weird contradictions, how can a player have great game shape, but still gas out halfway through a match? If you're in shape for the sport, you're in shape. I do think heavy minutes should still show and affect performance somehow, but streamlining those mechanics would cut out a ton of unnecessary micro management.

We also need to fix how the market gets exploited to bypass actual team building. Right now, people abuse the newcomer help to buy 35k to 55k a week players for a full season without training a single thing, just to game the system.

Cut the new user hand holding. Give new teams 3 weeks of salary floor exemption and nothing more. I don't want to hear the competitive excuses, too many people use it as an abuse the game to buy super players instead of learning how to train a real team. Or, at the very least, limit them to buying two players the 1st season, no greater than 8k a week.

Stop playoff rentals. To stop teams from buying stacked rosters right before the playoffs, we need a trade deadline rule. Two weeks before or after the All Star break, no team should be allowed to sell players, buying is fine, but selling is locked.

The 30 day playoff rule is another option. Make it so any player bought within 30 days of the playoffs is ineligible to play in them. This forces managers to win with the team they actually scouted, drafted, and trained.

Last edited by Big city at 10/16/2026 11:27:30 PM

Hello

As owner , winning!! 😊

Last edited by Big city at 10/17/2026 12:19:11 AM

First of all, you provided zero arguments to prove me wrong that current system is better. Just because you are used to it doesn't mean it's good.

Second, I've played browser basketball manager for over 10 years, former Charazay and also played BB a long time ago but dropped it in favor of Charazay which, overall, was a better game.

And your logic, that someone who is younger can't give a good constructive suggestion without counter-argument says a lot about you...

Cheers, and stay positive !

What is the "reality of the game" in your opinion? You expect me to go scroll through (tens of?) thousand of forum threads to maybe find what you could have possible meant by your response?

You could just provide a real counter argument and say what you mean. You know this is a place to discuss? Just some "trust me bro" type sh*t.