BuzzerBeater Forums

België - II.4 > season 32

season 32

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Bradok
This Post:
00
272559.1
Date: 8/6/2015 3:58:00 PM
Royal Canin
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
Looks like we have two big contenders for the title this year ...

KV Forever 15 $ 504 667
boes 17 $ 484 974
TheRainmakers 14 $ 388 321
Asingratitos B.C. 15 $ 387 892
Fantasio Casteau 11 $ 374 682
Havré-Hurricane 11 $ 372 894
Royal Canin 12 $ 368 222
Tijuana Burrritos 13 $ 359 905
the johnsons 15 $ 331 493
Magic Mauves 18 $ 294 679
Goalois 16 $ 292 319
Collosi 14 $ 291 704
rubo niel 15 $ 251 921
Underwold Tigers 15
Balrogs 16 $ 169 449
ychonodou 14 $ 153 873

From: BigT

This Post:
00
272559.2 in reply to 272559.1
Date: 8/8/2015 12:27:57 PM
TheRainmakers
BBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
8787
well you beat boes with a difference of 120k salary less

salaries mean nothing if one team has a roster with players who have only trained their primary skills versus a team with players that have trained secondaries and primaries (the 1 st team will have higher salaries)

For me KV Forever is the team to beat, they have only Belgium players so he will get a big merchandising boost over all of us, I followed BBBL and i know that his players are all around trained

Last edited by BigT at 8/8/2015 12:31:10 PM

From: Bradok

To: BigT
This Post:
00
272559.3 in reply to 272559.2
Date: 8/9/2015 12:54:35 PM
Royal Canin
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
It s indeed only an indication on the strenght of a team but a pretty good one... I ve sold a player since our last game against Boes so the difference was 3 "only" 50K... and he played take it eay while i played normal....

But indeed i think that KV is the team that has the morst chance to get back in BBBL next year

From: takis4
This Post:
00
272559.4 in reply to 272559.3
Date: 8/11/2015 5:17:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
Congrats to KV, that was a very solid performance! At least I don't have any regrets that Jobard could not play the game, even with him I would have lost. Can't really understand what happened in the 1st quarter though

This Post:
00
272559.5 in reply to 272559.4
Date: 8/12/2015 5:06:18 AM
KV Forever
BBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
Thank you :)

Still looking for new players though.
It might be enough to win the title with my current team, but it will be (too) close and for BBBL I need improvements anyway.
But since I only play with Belgians it's very hard to find the right players :(

This Post:
00
272559.6 in reply to 272559.5
Date: 8/28/2015 5:13:09 AM
KV Forever
BBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
@Boes,

A point difference of over 400 points after 6 games: you have it way too easy in your conference ;)

This Post:
00
272559.7 in reply to 272559.6
Date: 8/29/2015 9:00:53 AM
boes
II.3
Overall Posts Rated:
22
but you still remain the favorite with HCA 29/9 :-)

From: BigT
This Post:
00
272559.8 in reply to 272559.7
Date: 8/30/2015 10:31:12 AM
TheRainmakers
BBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
8787
So the 1st round is over let's have a look at some statistics (y)

Season 32 : Performances (by http://www.buzzer-manager.com)

Best collective performance of the season
Points : 830 : boes
Rebounds : 445 : boes
Assists : 204 : boes
Steals : 60 : boes
Block Shots : 57 : boes

Personal best performances of the season
Points : 52 : I. Shacham (the johnsons)
Rebounds : 27 : K. Grzywaczewski (Underwold Tigers)
Assists : 13 : M. Solyakov (boes), A. Dusart (ychonodou)
Steals : 6 : J. Janssens (Havré-Hurricane)
Block Shots : 5 : F. Rodríguez (Magic Mauves), S. Meuleman (KV Forever), G. Myles (Balrogs)

Top 5 of the season
Point Guard : E. Udoy (boes) (22.9 Points, 4.7 Rebounds, 7.3 Assists, 1.9 Steals, 1.1 Block Shots) : Efficiency : 26.9
Shooting Guard : I. Shacham (the johnsons) (37.7 Points, 2.7 Rebounds, 0.6 Assists, 0.4 Steals, 0.6 Block Shots) : Efficiency : 18.3
Small Forward : A. Bral (ychonodou) (26.3 Points, 10.7 Rebounds, 2.7 Assists, 1.2 Steals, 1.5 Block Shots) : Efficiency : 31.8
Power Forward : W. Boulot (boes) (20 Points, 14.7 Rebounds, 3.3 Assists, 0.9 Steals, 1.3 Block Shots) : Efficiency : 31.7
Center : G. Fahua (Fantasio Casteau) (25.6 Points, 15.4 Rebounds, 0.4 Assists, 0.1 Steals, 0.9 Block Shots) : Efficiency : 27.6

MVP of the season
A. Bral (ychonodou) (26.3 Points, 10.7 Rebounds, 2.7 Assists, 1.2 Steals, 1.5 Block Shots) : Efficiency : 31.8

The bad performance of the season
R. Turan (rubo niel) (0 Points, 5 Rebounds, 1 Assists, 0 Steals, 0 Block Shots) : Efficiency : -14

All kinds of statistics
The player who forgot to remove his mittens during the season : G. Fahua (Fantasio Casteau) : 33 Turnovers

Player targeted by the referees during the season : F. Rodríguez (Magic Mauves), M. Bonini (Underwold Tigers) : 29 Personnal Fouls

The iron-man of the season : G. Fahua (Fantasio Casteau) : 335 Minutes

The shooter of the season : I. Shacham (the johnsons) : 24 Three points

The best performer of the season : A. Put (KV Forever), A. Put (KV Forever) : Rating : 19.0

The worst performer of the season : T. Vervotte (rubo niel) : Rating : 1.0


This Post:
00
272559.9 in reply to 272559.8
Date: 9/5/2015 3:51:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
There's something really weird with this one: http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/85765039/boxscore.aspx

I actually don't mind the score. As I had little chance in winning this one, I decided to start my young guns and go for training minutes (I also set 'Strictly follow'). But as it turns out they hardly played. So either something went wrong with setting my lineup, but then my starters against BigT's starters shouldn't have lost by 60 (no injuries or foultrouble), or something else... Some bug? It seems to me my starters played with my trainee's skills? Is that even possible? We both played TIE, my gameshape wasn't exactly high, but not low either.
I can't wrap my head around this one.

This Post:
00
272559.10 in reply to 272559.9
Date: 9/5/2015 4:08:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1414
I was also puzzled by the difference...
As for yourfirst question it also happened to me in the past, I had put my young players and selected "strictly follow" and then found out that 1 minute into the game all the key players entered the court... I guess that if the quality difference between your usual starter and the bench player you decided to put in this game is too great the coach will put him back whatever you do (by the way what level coach do you have?)

As for the difference no clue sorry :-( unless the rainmakers invested in a doping programme!

This Post:
00
272559.11 in reply to 272559.10
Date: 9/5/2015 4:21:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
That's what I thought first, but if you re-watch the game, the key players or on the court at tip-off. Except for my SF, who's a bench player, so I guess my lineup-set did get through, partially at least. Well, whatever, the result is correct and in the end my bench players played enough this week. Must be a bug.
I have a level 6 trainer, who's now facing treason-charges