BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > New Merchandise Income[Official Thread]

New Merchandise Income[Official Thread]

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Yanivsh

This Post:
11
315010.3 in reply to 315010.2
Date: 06/11/2022 16:06:49
Stars Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
1717
Second Team:
Stars Team II
The concept looks good.
However I agree that 15% is not significant enough.
I would suggest 25%.

This Post:
11
315010.4 in reply to 315010.1
Date: 06/11/2022 16:12:59
BC Vitosha Sofia
A Grupa
Overall Posts Rated:
776776
Second Team:
Sofia Alpha Dogz
Should probably be more than 15% in order to attract sufficient attention, yeah. But although that's not too good for me, personally - give the bonus only to those whose salaries (-bonus) are above the salary floor, cause otherwise... well you very well know why. ;)

BBB: 2 (S37 S38); Top tier: 7 (S35 S36 S37 S38 S39 S41 S63); Cup: 9 (S25 S35 S36 S37 S38 S39 S40 S41 S61)
This Post:
66
315010.5 in reply to 315010.1
Date: 06/11/2022 17:44:04
Wuhan Wastrels
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
4545
Pretty cool idea, makes sense in the BB world and real world.

I would maybe suggest that there's a depreciation in % for every star you have. for example

1st star: 25% of salary as merch
2nd star: 20% of salary as merch
3rd star: 15% of salary

And so on and so forth.

In reality the team only has so many fans, even if you've got a great starting 5 your fans aren't gonna buy a jersey of every high salary player in your team. They'll only buy merch from their favourite player.

All in all good premise.

This Post:
33
315010.7 in reply to 315010.1
Date: 06/12/2022 02:59:04
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
The concept sounds good.

This alternative too, if it's not too much, of course:

1st star: 25% of salary as merch
2nd star: 20% of salary as merch
3rd star: 15% of salary

And so on and so forth.


If you add 10% to the 4th top player and 5% to the 5th one, you'd have a medium 15% for your "supposedly" starting five or, at least, 15% of your 5 top players, which should be around half the whole squad.

This Post:
00
315010.9 in reply to 315010.8
Date: 06/12/2022 10:47:41
Overall Posts Rated:
9494
Fair enough (thanks for the added info, btw).

In favor.

More so in the deeper rosters aspect, for sure.

As you mentioned, if it has a smaller but positive impact in the game, that can be furthered by other changes, sounds good. Makes it more balanced and versatile, while more difficult to dominate easily (all good).

This Post:
00
315010.11 in reply to 315010.1
Date: 06/12/2022 12:10:31
QQguest
I.1
Overall Posts Rated:
252252
In my opinion, the difference between higher salary and lower salary is too much. For example, 200k is 4 times greater than 50k. The former is 30k bonus, but the latter is only 7.5k bonus. It is too little.
How about using this kind of formula:
Let x be the salary of their top salary player.
Bonus = a*x^b+c, where 0 < b < 1 ?

For example, Bonus = 67*x^0.5
67*200k^0.5 = 29963
67*50k^0.5 = 14982

Last edited by little Guest at 06/13/2022 04:39:54