BuzzerBeater Forums

Kinds words from you, but with all due repect, I have a roster that is 200 k over yours. And defeat should have been a no-go.

200 k roster wages is an enormous amount - if we both had the same wages I wouldn't have been beaten - but annihilated. Which basically means I am doing *something* wrong.

I was always extremely proud to keep results up with a "modest" roster. Now I'm on the other side of the fence, I deliberately chose to go on hard and spend more money than the opposition in order to get results. If I can't get those, what's the point in having a very expensive roster ?

Of course, in itself a defeat at yours isn't at all humiliating, you have a strong team. And nothing is done yet - but no matter how you consider, considering our respective forces, this is from me a severe counter-performance.

About replay, there's nothing to say - as you know, results are calculated before the game and then a match is generated with the calculated outcome.

I'm slowly starting to think that GDP is costing me more games than it makes me win them. Perhaps I should go M2M all the way.

Now, I still can't unserstand how Bellings put misery on a player whose inside defense + counter is over 30 skill points strong ...

I think the fact that your focus was completely wrong played a large part in your defeat.
You choose to focus on an outside defense, while Ventola played a inside offense, that's the complete opposite of your focus and a 100% wrong bet !
That certainly played a part in your defeat, for sure.

Last edited by Eagle at 08/12/2015 15:52:47

Did you guys also see the prizes that are currently paid for trainers, it is getting insane !
I've been trying to get a new trainer for almost 2 months now, but i only want one for a reasonable price.
Prizes that now are being paid for trainers are at least 400K above what i used to pay for a trainer with the same skill level, really crazy.

Last edited by Eagle at 08/13/2015 19:42:22

Yeah everything is amazingly expensive nowadays, I can't understand why.

> I think a heavy wage player doesn't mean a performing player.

Indeed, that's extremely true, that's why I wrote that I'm doing a poor job, because if I was doing well, I would have an excellent performance for small wages.

And since my players are very multi-skilled ones, I just don't understand.

I'll think about it over, after all I found the reinforcement I was looking for.

I also don't forget that failing at GDP had certainly an impact on the final result.

Last edited by Dartreb at 08/13/2015 07:25:58