BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - IV.49 > Meta-theories

Meta-theories

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
186351.3 in reply to 186351.2
Date: 6/2/2011 1:33:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4242
We are in sync . . . I put these comments and others in the other post I started on more general strategy topics. I fully agree with all of these. IF you must train more than 2 or 3 players, I am a big fan of 1v1 either guards or sf/pf. With 1v1, you can increase JS, HA and DR for 5 players (6 if you are lucky) consistently. Whether it is guards or forwards depends solely on the height of the players . . . obviously would work best to have players with great OD and passing skilss . .. then you could guard 1v1 train them for the whole season. If you did that, you would probably increase JS 6 levels, and HA and DR 5 or 6 each. Quite an improvement over an 18 week period.

This Post:
00
186351.4 in reply to 186351.3
Date: 6/2/2011 1:37:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Yeah, that is where most of my initial success in Div. III came from. I was able to do 1v1 so much due to training OD and passing when I first came into play...the result were wingmen who could guard and beat anyone. That's one part of the meta I'm still very iffy on. I can't decide if having a great PG/C or a great SF/SG is better. the Wingmen combo are just SO impactful as a whole but Centers (for ID and Rebounding) and PG (offensive flow) really can do a lot as well. Wingmen tend to make the game more exciting but C/PG control the game better. So I'm torn which way to go every time I train.