BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The top priority should be ???????????

The top priority should be ???????????

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
264484.9 in reply to 264484.6
Date: 10/25/2014 09:05:48
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
there are 3 TV match every season and there are lucky team that have always two of this at home and unlucky team that have every season two of this game away


I got the lucky draw on that this season. I end the first part of conference play with a home TV game against the team just demoted from the NBBA. If I lose, my next home game one week later is also a TV game, and then my third TV game is the road one the last game of the season.

This Post:
22
264484.11 in reply to 264484.1
Date: 10/25/2014 11:57:23
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Top 1 priority is to make a balanced game. In its current state it's not, thanks to GS bug that is occuring since Season 28. So, GS is top priority.

Second priority is to fix the Game Engine: To ensure the minutes of trainees with no random changes in Garbage Time, to minimize unrealistic instances of players get fouled out in 10 minutes, things like that.

Third priority is to reshape the site, to be more accessible and pretty for the newcomers. Pretty site = succesfull company.

Last priority IMO is the app. It could be useful but not vital. I don't see myself needing the app... My smartphone handles the game quite well with some patience.

This Post:
11
264484.12 in reply to 264484.5
Date: 10/25/2014 12:48:37
Durham Wasps
EBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
16271627
Second Team:
Sunderland Boilermakers
What are your thoughts as to what the number 1 priority should be and why?

I'd say the app. I'm not one of those that thinks the game is broken somehow. But an app and perhaps a more modern looking site can't be a bad thing.

This Post:
00
264484.13 in reply to 264484.11
Date: 10/25/2014 17:01:06
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
Must admit Im a bit surprised at the amount of Managers who have voted that "reducing the effect of game shape training", should be the number 1 priority.

I personally dont have much of an issue with it even though I hardly ever use it as instead I stick to training actual skills.

Interesting

Last edited by Sid Vicious at 10/25/2014 17:02:07

This Post:
33
264484.14 in reply to 264484.13
Date: 10/25/2014 17:39:51
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
I voted for that, honestly I think GS training as it is, is "destroying" the most enjoyable part of the game (for me of course), which is the training…

I don't think it should be completely removed from the training options though, but I think if we reduce the amount of times you can use it during the season, for like 4 times during regular season plus 1 if you reach the playoffs/playouts, it would be better for the game!!


I personally dont have much of an issue with it even though I hardly ever use it as instead I stick to training actual skills.

I have to also admit that I am surprised by this fact, I think it's really hard on the actual system to be competitive in top leagues (B3 + Australia top league) and still manage not to train game shape!!! I hope you are not alone in doing it, but I'm quite surprised (in the positive way) (y)

This Post:
00
264484.15 in reply to 264484.14
Date: 10/25/2014 18:39:48
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
I have to also admit that I am surprised by this fact, I think it's really hard on the actual system to be competitive in top leagues (B3 + Australia top league) and still manage not to train game shape!!! I hope you are not alone in doing it, but I'm quite surprised (in the positive way



Thanks I will take this as a compliment.

Like yourself I find training the most enjoyable part and its fair to say that the trainees who I have been training & continue to train are major factors in my recent success although that said I certainly got brought down to earth in the round of 32 in B3 last season

This Post:
00
264484.16 in reply to 264484.11
Date: 10/25/2014 19:12:03
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
I wish I had of put, "evening out the relative strength of game tactics" as an option.

Would have been interesting to see how that would have polled.



This Post:
00
264484.17 in reply to 264484.15
Date: 10/25/2014 21:17:43
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
Thanks I will take this as a compliment.


Yes, it was a compliment :)

I 'm almost certain that you can achieve success by training only skills (and not game shape), but I'm also almost certain that you can't achieve the same type of success in top leagues or in B3 (and you can take your case as a example). It's impossible because you have to fight against the teams that use GS, and I'm not criticizing them, if I was in a top league I would probably do the same...

But you can be really competitive in lower leagues where almost everybody trains skills, and that's what I am trying to do :)

This Post:
00
264484.18 in reply to 264484.17
Date: 10/25/2014 21:38:00
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
but I'm also almost certain that you can't achieve the same type of success in top leagues or in B3



Well my 40 game winning streak in Australia just come to an end but I won 2 1st Division championships and a Cup in that time.

I must admit that training is not as "beneficial" as it has been in the past as my trainees are now 26 & 27 years old and as a result aint popping anywhere near as much as they used to.

That said I feel obligated to push my trainees to their limits with Ryder currently being on 119 TSP and Williams on 122 TSP

The 3rd SF trainee Palmeri, I had I sold last season to help fund my assault on B3, so what I may have lost by not game shape training I would have thought I more than compensated for by being able to run at a large loss thanks to the 2.9 mill I sold Palmeri for

Advertisement