BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > Canada U21 - Training Guide

Canada U21 - Training Guide

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
11
141616.2 in reply to 141616.1
Date: 04/22/2010 03:32:12
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
Section 2: Weighting skills; what skills are needed at each position?

I really like well balanced players. In buzzer beater, every advantage counts. It is true that some advantages count more than others; the areas that are really key, for a position, are often called the primary skills for that position. Other skills are often called the secondary skills for a position. Here are some general categories:

Guard Skills: Outside Defense, Passing, Handling, Jump Shot, Jump Range, Driving
Big Man Skills: Inside Shot, Inside Defense, Rebounding, Shot Blocking
These are also skills! :P Stamina, Free Throws, Experience

Now let's break it down for each specific position (in rough order of importance).

Point Guard
Outside Defense, Passing, Handling, Jump Shot, Jump Range, Driving

Shooting Guard
Outside Defense, Jump Shot, Jump Range, Passing, Handling, Driving

Small Forward
Outside Defense, Jump Shot, Inside Defense, Inside Shot, Rebounding, Jump Range, Passing, Handling, Driving (basically everything is good, and the order of importance here is very rough; SFs can be built in many different ways)

Power Forward
Inside Defense, Inside Shot, Rebounding, Jump Shot

Center
Inside Defense, Inside Shot, Rebounding

For guards, some Inside Defense and Inside Shot is never bad (although not essential), and Rebounding also helps (although rebounding can cause much higher salaries, several seasons down the road).

For big men, especially PFs, Outside Defense, Passing, and Handling are all great to have. Jump Shot is very important to me at PF, and also helps at C.

I really like it if every player on the court can defend, move the ball, and score effectively.

As one final note, you might see that I don't have shot blocking anywhere. True! My opinion is that it is not much of an asset currently, given its relative impact on the game (as well as its cost in terms of salary).

Last edited by The Mogul at 04/22/2010 03:56:27

This Post:
00
141616.3 in reply to 141616.2
Date: 04/22/2010 03:32:22
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
Section 3: Setting Up a Training Program

When deciding on training, the most important questions are how many positions to train, who to train there, and what to train. To develop an U21 player, for future Canadian teams, it is likely that heavy single position training will be needed (for the skills that have this option).

I won't say much here about selecting trainees (although the above sections have some thoughts about trainees in general). One point I will make is that it is good to work with trainees that benefit from the same training programs. For example, you might select 3 players that all could use heavy IS training at C for a whole season, and then balanced IS, ID, RB training after that.

I also won't say much here about deciding what to train, other than that I think it is a good idea to strive for some balance. If a player is really low in a main skill, it is usually a good idea to work on that first. One reason for this is that players train faster in skills that are low (relative to their other skills), and train more slowly in a skill that is relatively high. For pure team training (stamina, free throws), it is usually best to only do these in weeks with fewer games (2 game weeks).

Managing Minutes
I would like to spend a little more time on managing minutes, for your trainees. Let's say that you have 3 trainees, and you would like to single position train them at C. To receive full training each week, they are going to need 48 minutes. In other words, they each need to play one full game. For game shape reasons, it can also work well to use each trainee as a backup in one game a week (say, at PF), but this is optional.

To force 48 minutes at a position, for a single game, it helps to set your lineup so that it is impossible for your trainee to be substituted out (under normal conditions). If your team is leading by 21 or more points in the 4th quarter, your coach will try to take out all of your starters, regardless of your instructions. With this in mind, for single position training, it is often a good idea to not let your coach have this option. You can stop him by not dressing any extra players for him to put in for your trainee. If you want to force 48 minutes, at just one position, the following lineup works well (Example names, trainee = Blenkinsop):

C: Blenkinsop Blenkinsop Blenkinsop
PF: Someguy Jimmy Jimmy
SF: Chuckd Ripp Ripp
SG: Jabir Paulo Paulo
PG: Congyou Muggsy Muggsy

Only 9 players are dressed, total
Coach: Strictly Follow Depth Chart
Fouls: Let Them Play

If you do that, your trainee will play the whole game. The only things that will take him out are an injury, fouling out, or annoying randomness at the end of quarters (which I've only seen extremely rarely, and you basically don't need to worry about this).

I'll also add, that for game shape purposes, it tends to work best if you can get your trainee near the 60-65 minutes range. More broadly, 48-75 minutes per week tends to be pretty good.

Bonus Strategy: Secondary Trainees
Some training types, such as rebounding and jump shot, can only be trained at 2 positions. One thing that can work well, for some teams, is to have 3 main trainees (single position trained each week) and 2 somewhat trainable other guys. Let's say your trainees are being trained at PG. For the first two games in a week, you could aim for single position training at PG for your main trainees, with the other guys getting minutes at SG. However, if something goes wrong (say, a main trainee fouls out), you can adjust for the 3rd game, and get all 5 guys full jump shot training (which is a 2 position type of training anyway). This is something to think about, at least. If my memory is right, I think that Superfly Guy (a world class manager) has said some positive things about this setup.

Last edited by The Mogul at 04/22/2010 04:00:52

This Post:
11
141616.4 in reply to 141616.3
Date: 04/22/2010 03:32:34
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
Section 4: Projected Development

To make a quality U21 player, as mentioned earlier, it really helps to start from the age of 18. In this section, I'd like to present an imaginary case study of how a player might progress (roughly) each season. This is intended to help give an idea of what I'm looking for down the road, in terms of well balanced guys. I also thought it could be good to share some of the thought process I have when thinking about how to train.

Example Guard (PG/SG)
I think of PGs and SGs as very similar players. I like it if players at either position can defend, protect/move the ball, and score. The main difference to me is that a PG, in general, benefits from slightly better ball movement skills (handling, passing). A SG, in general, needs slightly better shooting skills (jump shot, jump range).

Test Player: Random sample Canadian player, that is pretty good right out of the draft. Let's call him Steve. "Steve" started out with the following skills, when he was drafted at age 18:

Height: 6'4", 193 cm
Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: respectable
Outside Defense: respectable Handling: awful
Driving: mediocre Passing: average
Inside Shot: awful Inside Defense: respectable
Rebouding: respectable Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: pitiful Free Throws: awful

Wow, Steve's good! With skills like that, it would be possible to make him into a nice SF. However, he could also be trained as a pure guard. Let's see what might happen each year if we do that, and give him some nice well rounded combo guard training, with perhaps an SG slant (estimates from my good friend, trainer parrot):

Season 12 (age 18):
Plan - heavily train handling, to build up his lowest guard skill, while also mixing in some passing. Single position trained at PG, level 5 trainer, with results:

At 19
Jump Shot: respectable Jump Range: respectable
Outside Defense: strong (+1) Handling: strong (+5)
Driving: proficient (+4) Passing: proficient (+3)
Inside Shot: awful Inside Defense: respectable
Rebouding: respectable Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: pitiful Free Throws: awful

Season 13 (age 19):
Plan - Work on OD and JR, while sneaking in a passing pop

At 20
Jump Shot: strong (+1) Jump Range: proficient (+2)
Outside Defense: prolific (+3) Handling: prominent (+2)
Driving: prolific (+2) Passing: prominent (+1)
Inside Shot: awful Inside Defense: strong (+1)
Rebouding: respectable Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: pitiful Free Throws: awful

Season 14 (age 20):
Plan - Work on OD for 2 pops, then switch to JS (2 position training)

At 21
Jump Shot: prolific (+3) Jump Range: prominent (+1)
Outside Defense: tremendous (+2) Handling: prolific (+1)
Driving: sensational (+1) Passing: prominent
Inside Shot: inept (+1) Inside Defense: strong
Rebouding: respectable Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: pitiful Free Throws: awful

Everybody dance now! Steve made the U21, as those skills happened to be good enough to earn a spot on the season 15 team (in imaginary Steve land).

continued in next post ------>


Last edited by The Mogul at 04/22/2010 03:46:37

This Post:
00
141616.5 in reply to 141616.4
Date: 04/22/2010 03:44:08
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
<-----continued

Season 15 (age 21):
Plan - get one more level of OD, then train JS all season

His last week on the U21, he looks like:

Jump Shot: wondrous (+3) Jump Range: prolific (+1)
Outside Defense: wondrous (+1) Handling: sensational (+1)
Driving: tremendous (+1) Passing: prominent
Inside Shot: inept Inside Defense: strong
Rebouding: respectable Shot Blocking: respectable
Stamina: pitiful Free Throws: awful

Yay for Steve! If his potential is allstar, he's probably hit it now, or possibly a couple of pops earlier than that. With higher potential, he can keep training into his age 22 season, and possibly beyond, and on to national team glory (depending on just how high his potential is).

That was all just an example, with estimated training speeds, but the pop rates seem reasonable based on my observations of various players. Also, Steve was lucky enough to stay injury free, but that is somewhat offset by his 6'4" height (which slows him down compared to, say, a 5'11" guy). The main goal was to give an idea of how an U21 training program might go for a particular player, in terms of types of training and general development.

Ok, that's all from me, for now. :)

Last edited by The Mogul at 04/22/2010 23:33:36

This Post:
00
141616.6 in reply to 141616.5
Date: 04/22/2010 04:18:07
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
One extra thing!

Details on what trains what, with rough speed estimates: (78242.1)

This Post:
00
141616.7 in reply to 141616.6
Date: 04/22/2010 08:43:58
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
Fantastic post! Cudo's to you for putting this together. These types of 'How To' post are incredibly helpful. I still refer to the post HPP made a season or two ago. And will surely do the same with this one.

Thanks again!


One extra thing!

Details on what trains what, with rough speed estimates: (78242.1)


I am starting to wonder if this is true. I was foolish enough to train a player from atrocious IS and have him currently up to strong. In that time I trained IS for 14+ weeks and got no secondary pop in ID. Is there a reason why? I have a level 5 trainer and the player has pretty decent potential(have a look he is on your U21 team) ;)


This Post:
00
141616.8 in reply to 141616.7
Date: 04/22/2010 10:43:40
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
Terrific job Mogul. This is an excellent write up and should be ESSENTIAL reading for almost every BB manager no matter how experienced. Training young players is an absolute must for any manager who wishes to be successful in BB.

This Post:
00
141616.9 in reply to 141616.8
Date: 04/22/2010 10:54:06
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Fantastic summary...all of my prospects will be following this theory.

This Post:
00
141616.10 in reply to 141616.7
Date: 04/22/2010 16:28:08
Overall Posts Rated:
5555
Training IS at Center (or C/PF) does provide secondary training to ID. I know, from experience, and have seen ID pop while training IS.

I suppose that for your guy, he could have gone 14+ weeks without an ID pop if:
- his initial ID sublevel was extremely low
- ID was relatively high (compared to his other inside skills), and trained slightly slower as a result
- his age was a bit higher than optimal
- his height is a bit lower than optimal for inside training
- maybe in some weeks, he didn't get a full 48 minutes?

Those are just some possible factors I can think of, some of which might apply to your guy. His ID sublevel should be very high now, in any case.

Last edited by The Mogul at 04/22/2010 17:22:39

This Post:
00
141616.11 in reply to 141616.10
Date: 04/22/2010 22:46:18
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Absolutely GREAT post Mogul... We should have more managers like you :)

This Post:
00
141616.12 in reply to 141616.1
Date: 07/18/2010 19:40:22
Overall Posts Rated:
00
hello this might be canada team u21
------------------------------------------------------------- Massimo Gaeta (16221886) Shooting Guard
Owner: ET-Rate

Weekly salary: $ 4 119

DMI: 10300
Age: 18
Height: 6'0" / 183 cm
Potential: allstar
Game Shape: respectable
Jump Shot: mediocre Jump Range: respectable
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: pitiful
Driving: atrocious Passing: respectable
Inside Shot: pitiful Inside Def.: average
Rebounding: mediocre Shot Blocking: mediocre
Stamina: pitiful Free Throw: awful

Experience: atrocious







------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Advertisement