I can recognize certain phrases or words (i took French in HS and College for a few years), but not a native speaker and would not want to offend anyone with a bad attempt :).
My policy has always been to limit scrimmages with the talent that is of age to play well in it, because it gives each other manager and staff a chance to evaluate the talent that we have. So unless i need to compare talent here to talent in other nations, there isn't that much for us to gain. If there is a scrimmage that looks appealing, i'll take it, but i don't intend to scrim just to play a game per say.
With regards to MVP-HOF, i tend to lean towards not being as bent on getting them to develop their primaries as i am with Superstar and PAS. I won't speak for RiP, but i would think that his general feeling is that most of those players, with the exception of the middle height (small forward sized) players, is that they will not be a part of successful NT run outside of backup roles. So i then can look at the active base of both nations. The US, like many larger regions, has a lot of farm/trader teams that beef it's numbers. I think the active base there is much closer to 350-400 users, compared to about 75-90 Canadians. So i never really anticipate having the same amount of guys with huge big skills or guard skills for that matter. We did however have competent guards this season, thanks to one owner who was really good at developing both a 20 and 21 year old.
Our top two bigs did have decent secondaries, and it did work ok for us when we ran patient once this season (the inverted patient, and not the traditional), but unfortunately you have to be within 3ish BSP to be competitive. Peru's top big was almost a full 10 BSP ahead, with their second and third option 7 and 6 ahead while their two 6 potential bigs were about even with ours by the time the season concluded (given they capped out early on). More importantly, Peru had a decisive inside defense and perimeter defense advantage (average 16 OD across PG/SG/SF and average 15 across the bigs used). We didn't have a big above 15 ID on the team (won't disclose where each player is at beyond that, don't want to make it hard for those owners to be league competitive with their talent), and our one player that paced there as a 20 year old has fallen off since being dealt in gameshape so was quite unusable by seasons end. Peru in terms of it's user base is smaller, but have bought into using 6-8 potential players to make millions to fund their competitive teams, so that buy-in is what i am trying to bring into play here.
My generation is only as good as Canada can produce, we'll see what happens :)
Last edited by FurY at 01/23/2019 21:06:34