You're overestimating how random results would become without the presence of HCA, and conversely underestimating GDP and effort.
It is just an example, but i believe the numbers might be close. Also no need to estimate GDP and effort, because they are used with HCA also, so only the changed variable in this case HCA should be estimated.
By that I mean, if you're the best team in your conference, but have to play away against the best team in the other conference, that really hurts one's chances of having HCA when the two teams meet again in the finals.
It can happen both ways with equal chances, overall there is no advantage if looking from farrer perspective. And from closer it might let weaker team win/promote if draw is lucky, creating more interesting game.
B3 is another example, you might get an easy road schedule, or you might have to play all of the top teams away and risk missing the 32 even as one of the best teams in the world.
Totally agree, B3 is not fair, spread of deviation is toogreat. Exactly what would happen in results, not opponents if getting rid of HCA in normal leagues.
PS: I never even said anything about my personal experiences with HCA so I don't know why you're going on about my team suddenly becoming worse if it didn't exist.
Nothing personal, it was just example. Overall worse team loses. And there is so much stuff to do, because in most cases you know weeks before playoffs you wont have HCA for example, so there is time to preprare for that. HCA is not the only thing which makes lose finals.
Last edited by Vilkai [LTU NT] at 09/22/2020 09:53:02