First and foremost, change was needed but agreeing that change was necessary and agreeing with how those changes have been implemented are two entirely different things, so I do believe there could have been more options to the poll.
The high-IS guards and SB bigs with 3-2 zone meta have become stale with too many teams adopting the same approach, so a revamp to the salary formula was overdue. If the hoarding tax change was given more notice and done gradually over a 3-4 season period, then I think managers would have been a lot happier with the implementation.
However, both changes feel rushed and poorly thought through, without real analysis on the consequence of making those changes, so drastically and immediately. Good intentions don't excuse poor execution and because the way these changes were implemented, I voted that I do not support these policies.
Last edited by js8 at 9/9/2026 9:16:56 AM