If the argument would be that best 4 teams wouldn't be able to participate to that round, then it could be also said, that losers of each round wouldn't be able to participate to next rounds (so they wouldn't get new chances to set new records) either. But enough of the speculation already on my part.
That's exactly why. The top four teams don't play. They can't. It's different from the quarterfinals, semifinals, and finals. Anyone can get there.
I consider a round that the top 4 teams don't participate in as a qualification for the playoffs. It's my subjective view. Everyone can look at it differently. That's OK.
Yes, everyone can have their views. And as a consequence, I view these stats differently as far as Playoffs-stats are concerned, due to not whole Playoffs being calculated in. But again, that's just my view, and people have different opinions.
Well, theoretically anyone can get there (Quarters, Semis' and so on), but unless you do well in Regular Season, you know very well it's been impossible for anyone to win against your team or VPO, so so far this possibility of proceeding further in a Playoffs from a bad Playoff position has remained purely theoretical in practice by a somewhat large (and sometimes crushingly large) margin.
Also, taking a different approach/view (or in a way to continue on that line/spirit, that some teams can't play on First Round), one could also say that top4 teams
could be playing on First Round, but they played too well to be able to do that, so yes, they also can get to play on First Round, it´s their "fault" that they don't play in there. (Having said that, of course I don't encourage anyone to lose on purpose, and to be fair I can identify contradictions in my previous sentence to some extent).
Again, I understand why in NCAA they call it play-in/First Four, because it's more like a warm-up to Playoffs (as 8 of 68 teams participate in it). Also in NBA play-in round doesn't include as many matches, as Playoff rounds do. But if in HGL, just as many play in First Round as in Second Round, aka. quarter-final round. (This doesn't make your opinion wrong though, but I wanted to underline my point).
I also knew from the beginning when introducing this Playoff system, that this Playoff format would create different amount of games to different teams, and whenever not all teams "of same level" aren't included in each and every round, it causes some problems in statistics, at least if you want to compare all teams equally.
(This same problem would be in a league, in which not everybody faces everybody else during season, which is one of the reasons it's great we don't have that problem in HGL).
Anyway, just like you said, differing opinions are more norm than an exception, and everyone can have their take on things, which is fine. Additionally, as mentioned before, you have done tremendously good work with releasing stats in the past (which I hope will be continued into the future), and as a creator of stats, you have freedom to make them like you wish.
So this post must not be understood as an any kind of attack towards your fine work, but just as an opinion of one person - person, who is trying to understand how others see things, why they do what they do, and sometimes give lengthy replies, as has been the case here.
Also, if again middle ground would be worth to be searched, then maybe separate stats and all-time records from First Round could be gathered/saved, in addition to those stats concerning only qtr, semis, and medal games.
Last edited by Wagner at 1/29/2026 1:52:13 PM