BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Fair draft!

Fair draft!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
1010
323401.2 in reply to 323401.1
Date: 03/27/2024 12:12:36
Kerlci
SKL
Overall Posts Rated:
14951495
Second Team:
Kerlci II
The chance to have a National Team consisting entirely of players with potential 11 must have all nations!


By todays distribution of talent, no national team can have only potential 11 players, since it is completely normal for big nations to have one or none such draftee in a given season. They are "one in 1000 or more" players, and I hope it will remain this way.

And rookies are distributed equally -percentage wise. Smaller nations are just...smaller.

Utopia has 1500 teams, if you want to even the amount of HoF+ players for all 98 nations, a huge percentage of Utopia draftees would have to be HoF.

Last edited by Deschamps at 03/27/2024 12:14:33

This Post:
1010
323401.5 in reply to 323401.1
Date: 03/27/2024 13:28:38
Wasted Potential
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
454454
Second Team:
Hazards to Society
While this may be a "fair draft" when it comes to national teams, it would not be fair when looking at a club level if I understand this correctly. If every nation is getting the same amount of rookies with 10 or 11 potential then those nations with a small amount of users are almost guaranteed to draft a 10 or 11 player in every draft, giving them a massive advantage on their club team.

I think having more users should be an advantage for a national team (I know that is easy to say as a USA user), but if you have more users you should have more good players to pick from and this encourages individual nations to grow their BB community (though I recognize that is much easier for some countries than others). However, I don't see why we should try and give 50 users the equal shot at a gold as 1200 users.

This Post:
00
323401.9 in reply to 323401.8
Date: 03/28/2024 00:48:52
White Yar
SuperLiga
Overall Posts Rated:
943943
The two largest nations, Italy and Spain, receive only 2 19-year-old legends. It smells like justice))

This Post:
22
323401.10 in reply to 323401.6
Date: 03/28/2024 01:22:21
ExplosiveBubbleWrap
III.10
Overall Posts Rated:
13621362
Second Team:
BubblesExploded
From BB-Justin:

"The data is very interesting.

Your numbers don't include the players drafted by bots.

For example, here's the number of ATG players generated in D.I, D.II, and D.III:
(all countries with at least 2)
Nederland 5
Australia 5
Belgium 3
Portugal 3
Slovenija 3
Bosna i Hercegovina 3
Cyprus 3
Singapore 3
Ukraina 2
Iran 2
Sverige 2
Pilipinas 2
Malaysia 2
Hellas 2
USA 2
Lietuva 2
Hrvatska 2
Latvija 2
Makedonija 2
Sakartvelo 2

Here is the D.IV ATG draftees (countries with at least 2):
USA 8
China 7
Uruguay 7
Brasil 7
Australia 7
Belgium 7
Suomi 5
Slovenija 5
Israel 4
Latvija 4
Deutschland 4
Magyarország 4
Argentina 4
Taiwan 4
Türkiye 4
Hellas 4
Polska 4
Canada 3
France 3
England 3
Portugal 3
Bosna i Hercegovina 3
Česká Rep. 2
Eesti 2
Lietuva 2
Hrvatska 2
Pilipinas 2

Here's the combined total D. I - D.IV:
(top 10 counties)
Australia 12
Belgium 10
USA 10
China 8
Slovenija 8
Uruguay 7
Brasil 7
Hellas 6
Bosna i Hercegovina 6
Portugal 6

I won't include any D.V data since there are all bots, but France had a whopping 25 ATGs in D.V."

The USA had a luckiest draft we have ever had but looking at the overall data, Belgium and Australia had just as many ATG draftees in D.I - D.IV, they just couldn't retain as many of them because the USA has many more managers so not as many went to bots.

Bubbles BuzzerBeater Official YouTube Channel:(https://www.youtube.com/@BubblesBuzzerBeater)