BuzzerBeater Forums

Users who have milliions of cash sitting in their bank cannot seem to grasp it at all, sigh.

90% of the userbase in BB doesn't have millions acumulated sitting in their bank, 90% of the userbase in BB will try to save any and EVERY penny in bids by bidding the minimum possible.

I do it and 90% of the userbase of BB does it, where's the silly argument?

Is there a page where we can view our Nation's "Division's Ranking" for the purpose of reference on whom are those in the Top Priority for Bot Promotions? If none yet can you place something like it on our Coutrry's Overview Page too please? :D

If there is already one... can you give me a sample link? cause I did find it hard to manually scan Divsion 3... and look at the Teams Standings...

I think his argument is a kind of this: "I like bid wars if I won a bid war. I don't like bid wars if I lost a bid war."

What all of you forget is that in most cases, especially while buying rookies most teams bid wars on multiple players, as much as like 20 (personal experience) and 3 minutes seems even little tooshort, would like 5 minutes. I used to miss few good rookie deals because attention were somewhere else, on another bid screen.

Please, tell me that is fixed to this WORLD CUP Repechage.

"Repechage: Why European team always start against the African team?"
(306438.1)


European nations are playing every repechage with a "handicap" obtaining "free enth" in their first match.

We, the Asians and americans nation are struggling every repechage at a disadvantage, please hope it is solved with a raffle. Thanks!



Last edited by Lolo_vago(NTM)👽 at 06/26/2021 00:44:28

Ok, we agree in principal then

Yes, there are many changes that would make the World Cup more fun for everyone.

I even think that should increase the participants, especially for Europe where the continental tournament is more competitive.

One of my players has just finsihed his 15th season with my team.
He's head and shoulders above the rest in all-time Games, PTS, REB and he should move up to 2nd place in AST this season.
He's old though and shall start dropping skill points soon.

A couple of seasons ago, I had a player in a similar situation, even though not nearly what the above player has achieved for my team.

There was the possibility to make him a member of my staff, which was lovely. I didn't doubt at the time since he had the perfect profile.

On second hand I probably should have, as the option was only available once, and the above player is far more suited. But why??

The fee and salary were fixed per level, and I do not recall them being more competitive than what was available on the market.

So why was it only availble once?
Or why do we block an extra opportunity of bonding with your team and player-coaches with a system that is already available and working?

And if there is no (good) reason, can we please open up this option without or with other limitations?

Cheers